Weatherly International Plc ("Weatherly" or "the Company")
Final Results for Year Ended 30 June 2011
Weatherly is pleased to announce its final results for the year ended 30 June 2011.
Financial
· Loss for the year of US$0.5 million
· Mines operating as a stand-alone and profitable business
· Cash at bank US$9.1 million as at 30 June 2011
· Dividends paid to shareholders during the year equivalent to US$12.4 million
Operational
· Mining resumed at Otjihase and Matchless mines
· 18-month programme of forward sales put in place for 35% of budgeted output at an average of US$9,565/t copper
· Tschudi feasibility study on track and due for completion in mid-2012
· Kombat sale completed in December 2010
Corporate
· John Bryant appointed Chairman in December 2010
· Share placing in November 2010 raised £4.1 million (net) at 5p per share
· Key management appointments
· China Africa Resources plc admitted to AIM
· Local participation with Labour Investment Holdings investment in Ongopolo Mining Ltd
The year under review has been one of transformation for our company. After the difficulties that we encountered in 2008 as a result of the global economic downturn, we have successfully restructured our operations. This has culminated in the reopening of two of our mines - Otjihase and Matchless - on more favourable operating terms, the commissioning of two feasibility studies for the Tschudi open pit and Tsumeb tailings projects, the enhancement of our management team, and the establishment of a new publicly listed company with an important Chinese major shareholder.
Financial results
The group made a loss before taxation for the year of US$0.5 million, after recognising a US$6.8 million increase in value of Dundee Precious Metals Inc shares. These shares when issued to shareholders as a dividend were worth US$12.4 million. During the past 18 months, we have paid three dividends 'in specie' to our shareholders, the latest being a distribution of shares in China Africa Resources plc (post year-end).
At year end, Ongopolo had delivered 2,792 metric tonnes of concentrate to the port at Walvis Bay. As control over the inventory had not passed to our customer at 30 June, the group did not take any sales to account. The inventory had an agreed sales value of US$5.1 million and a profit of US$2.6 million which will be released in the first half of the 2012 financial year. In the second half of the year, when Otjihase and Matchless entered production, the mines reported a loss of US$1.8 million which would have been a profit of US$0.8 million if the inventory delivered to port had been recognised as sales as described above.
Excluding the increase in the value of the shares, the group made a loss for the year of US$7.3 million. Costs relating to the start up of the Otjihase and Matchless mines have been recognised as an expense in the profit and loss statement, whereas costs relating to specific development projects within the mines (US$4.7 million) have been capitalised. The US$7.3 million loss excluding the increase in share value can be broken down as a loss on the continuing mining operation of US$4.6 million, UK head office costs of US$3.1 million, net interest payable of US$0.1 million, and profit on the sale of Kombat of US$0.5 million.
Review of the year
We are once more mining copper. Our production team in Namibia, led by Craig Thomas, has successfully restarted our Central Operations (Otjihase and Matchless mines) which, after some initial commissioning difficulties and delays, are now producing at approximately 74% of the annualised target rate of 7,000 tonnes. In order to protect our profit margin we have instigated a risk management programme that involved putting in place forward sales of up to 35% of our anticipated production output. As at 30 June 2011 the weighted average price of the forward sales was US$9,565/t, well above the current price, for a period of 18 months (to September 2012). It is the current intention of the Board to continue this strategy of maintaining a 15 - 18 month forward position on its copper sales.
Our recently recruited Group Executive for Project Development, Dominic Claridge, is leading the Tschudi open pit and the Tsumeb tailings projects, both of which are currently the subject of feasibility studies and which may have some synergies in a combined development.
The Tschudi feasibility study is evaluating a project to deliver 13,000 tonnes of copper per annum in a heap leach open pit development. The first draft of the feasibility study (BFS) is expected to be available in the New Year. We are undertaking additional drilling and test work to satisfy the requirements of financiers with whom we are already in discussions for funding all or part of the project. It is expected that the securing of funding for the project and a final investment decision will be taken in mid-2012.
Under the terms of our management services agreement Dominic is also working on the feasibility study for Berg Aukas, the lead/zinc project that was vended into our recently AIM-listed company, China Africa Resources plc (CAR). The major shareholder in CAR is East China Minerals Exploration and Development Bureau for Non-Ferrous Metals (ECE), which brings a wealth of global mining experience and we look forward to building a new and successful mining venture with them, going forward.
The placing in November 2010 to raise £4.1 million (net) saw the introduction of some new institutions to our share register - notably Blackrock, which has subsequently increased its holding and is now our largest shareholder with 10.01%. During the period under review, the share price rose from 2.6p to 9.5p, reaching a high of 15.0p on 4 January, 2011. The directors believe that the recent share price does not reflect the underlying value of the company and we are increasing our investor relations activities across all sectors of the market to address this.
While the market has reacted unfavourably to some of the statements coming from the Government of Namibia, we had positive discussions with the President, Mr Hifikipunye Pohami during his recent visit to the UK. Weatherly is well represented in Namibia with some highly respected non-executive directors on the boards of our local operating subsidiaries. In the absence of a formal black empowerment requirement, we are encouraging our local Namibian partners to participate in our operations by way of direct equity investments in our subsidiary, Ongopolo Mining Limited, up to a total of 20%. Labour Investment Holdings, the investment arm of the National Union of Namibian Workers, is the first group to take up a 2.5% shareholding and has a five year option to increase its interest to 5%.
Outlook
The current economic uncertainty that seems to have become part of our daily lives looks set to continue for some time. Despite short-term volatility, we believe that demand for copper will be sustained in the medium term from the emerging countries of Asia Pacific, particularly China and India.
Against this background, we believe Weatherly has the essential elements in place for a successful future. We have strong cash flows from our operating mines, protected in part by our prudent risk management strategy, and cash resources of US$ 7.1 million (as at 30 September 2011). We expect to begin a drilling programme towards the end of 2011 at two exploration targets: Tschudi and at Tsumeb West. Building on the success at Central Operations we are preparing plans to increase production by reopening the 'Old Matchless' mine. Previous studies indicate that a significant resource of 1.06 m/t @2.5% Cu (non compliant historic resource) remains below the previously mined out area. We believe that we have projects which should enable us to reach our stated target of 20,000 tonnes per annum of copper production and a growth pipeline which will enable us to realise additional value for our shareholders.
We not only have the resources and projects, but we have an experienced board of directors who have steered the company through difficult times. We have in place a strong management team which is delivering on Weatherly's corporate goals, and we are extremely grateful for the commitment and hard work of all our staff.
John Bryant Rod Webster
Chairman Chief Executive Officer
11 October 2011
Central Operations
The past year has been challenging, but it is very gratifying that the programme we set in motion last year to return to full production is being realised. The board took the decision in July 2010 to reopen the Otjihase and Matchless mines, which had been closed since late 2008, with an ambitious target to recommence production in Q1 2011.
The capital cost of reopening the mines including working capital, was US$12 million.
These funds were raised, in part, by way of a US$7 million prepayment agreement entered into by Louis Dreyfus Commodities and our Namibian subsidiary, Ongopolo Mining Limited, which included an offtake and forward sales agreement. This was a financing package in which repayment of the facility is linked to concentrate production, with payments matched to the amount of concentrate delivered and deducted from sales proceeds - thereby reducing risk in the event of any unexpected production delays. Repayments began seven months after the first drawdown of the loan, and all monies outstanding under the terms of the facility are secured against the assets of Ongopolo Mining Limited. The prepayment facility contains a risk management framework which allows Ongopolo Mining Limited to sell forward up to 35% of its output for a period of 18 months.
The remaining funds were generated from cash holdings in Namibia, the proceeds of the sale of the Kombat mine, sales from our real estate portfolio and local bank funding.
Between January and March, Ongopolo Mining Limited entered into forward sales contracts with Louis Dreyfus Commodities for 3,375 tonnes of copper to be delivered progressively over an 18 month period, at a weighted average price of US$9,565 per tonne. The forward contracts represent approximately 35% of forecast copper production over that period.
The ramp-up of the Otjihase and Matchless mines was a slower process than originally planned, owing to a number of commissioning problems. These included the late delivery of key equipment and difficulties with transport exacerbated by extremely wet weather. However, our central operations are now approaching target levels of production (580 tonnes per month or 7,000 tonnes per annum of copper), with costs of production following a typical trend for a ramp-up phase. The initial delays left us a month behind on our previously stated targets, and so in July we announced that we had reduced our production forecast for calendar year 2011 to 4,000 tonnes. Over the coming year, the main objective for the team, ably led by Chief Operating Officer, Craig Thomas, is to consolidate production and improve efficiencies.
During Q1 2011/12 (July, August and September 2011) provisional cash costs are US$4707 per tonne (net of credits). Production was at approximately 74% of our target levels and as production increases we would expect net cash costs to fall.
The two mines are now operating as a financially independent business, with all capital purchases completed.
Northern Operations
Tschudi
The Tschudi project which is wholly contained in a granted mining licence (ML 125) located approximately 20km due west of the town of Tsumeb contains a JORC-compliant resource of 47.7 million tonnes grading 0.86% Cu and 10.6 g/t Ag, including the measured and indicated resource of 28.8 million tonnes grading 0.93% Cu and 11.09 g/t Ag (Coffey Mining 2009).
Sedgman Limited was engaged to manage the feasibility study for Tschudi, which included supervising the metallurgical test work conducted by Bureau Veritas - Amdel Limited (Amdel) and assessing potential processing routes.
This established a compelling case for the development of a stand-alone heap leach operation and enabled the Board to take an early decision to complete the feasibility study based on a heap leach processing route rather than flotation.
Accordingly the Sedgman feasibility study will evaluate a stand-alone 2 million tonne per annum open pit utilising a heap leach/SX-EW processing route. Based on existing resources, the project would have a life of at least 10 years and produce approximately 13,000 tonnes of copper annually.
In addition to the detailed design and costing of the heap leach option, the scope of the feasibility study will include a new pit design together with any resulting amendments to the environmental permit which was granted in 2003. The proposed heap leaching route will mean that we can produced a final LME-grade copper product within Namibia, which will be an important step in terms of adding value.
We made an early start to our financing discussions with the banks, and this has led us to commission additional drilling and leaching test work in order to satisfy their requirements. Preliminary indications are that debt finance will be available to us at beneficial rates and we expect to be able to complete the financing and make an investment decision by mid-2012.
Tsumeb Tailings
We are undertaking a formal investigation into the feasibility of copper production from the old tailings at Tsumeb.
Coffey Mining completed an estimate of the resources in the tailings and have concluded that they contain a JORC-compliant measured resource of 12mt grading 0.48% Cu, 0.77% Pb, 0.63% Zn and 12.74g/t Ag.
Sedgman has been mandated to complete a feasibility study for this project and to examine synergies that may exist with the development of the Tsumeb project.
Tambao, Burkina Faso
We have been unable to progress our rights to the Tambao manganese project, and accordingly we have commenced proceedings in the International Court of Justice.
Berg Aukas and China Africa Resources
During the year, we finalised our joint venture with our Chinese partner, East China Minerals Exploration and Development Bureau for Non-Ferrous Metals (ECE). On 1 August 2011 (post year-end), our new company, China Africa Resources plc was listed on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange. ECE has a majority holding of 65% of the issued capital, Weatherly is interested in 25% of the issued share capital, and 10% of the share capital was distributed to Weatherly shareholders as a dividend 'in specie'. Weatherly vended in its Berg Aukas lead/zinc project while ECE made a capital contribution of £4.8 million. These funds are being used to commence a feasibility study with a view to bringing Berg Aukas back into production as soon as possible. The longer term strategy for China Africa Resources is to build a profitable and widely-based resources business. Both Weatherly and ECE hope that the redevelopment and
re-commissioning of Berg Aukas will be the first in a number of projects that will see China Africa Resources develop successfully as an African/Chinese joint venture for the benefit of all its stakeholders.
Corporate developments
Following Wolf Martinick's resignation as Chairman, John Bryant was appointed Chairman on 14 December and Alan Stephens was appointed Senior Independent Non-executive Director. We are indebted to Wolf for all the hard work and commitment he has shown in the development of our company, and are very pleased that he will continue to make a valuable contribution as a non-executive member of the board.
In November 2010, we raised £4.1 million (net) by placing 89,022,880 ordinary shares at 5p per share. The placing saw the introduction of some new institutions to our share register - notably Blackrock, which has since increased its holding and is now our largest shareholder with 10.01% (post year end).
In the last 18 months we have paid three dividends in specie to our shareholders, the first two in shares in Dundee Precious Metals Inc as a result of the sale of the Tsumeb smelter, and the latest a distribution of shares in China Africa Resources plc which occurred post year end.
Environment
Weatherly is committed to maintaining the highest environmental standards as part of its overall business philosophy. During the forthcoming year, the company will be reviewing its environmental monitoring management and reporting systems to ensure it continues to do so. Weatherly is in full compliance with all appropriate Namibian legislation at all its sites.
There were no environmental incidents on any of our sites during the year.
Safety
Weatherly takes the health and wellbeing of its staff very seriously and maintains high standards of safety on all in sites. Weatherly operates all its sites in full compliance with all appropriate Namibian legislation.
| 2010/11 |
Fatalities | 0 |
Lost time injuries | 3 |
Management team
In Namibia we have been able to build up a strong and experienced management team led by our Chief Operating Officer, Craig Thomas.
Dominic Claridge, has recently been recruited as our Group Executive for Project Development. He is an Australian mining engineer with extensive experience in Australia and China in both senior executive and mine management capacities. In addition to our development projects he is also working on the feasibility study for Berg Aukas, the project which is currently the focus of the recently AIM listed company, China Africa Resources plc.
In addition Charles (Chuck) Carnie has been appointed as Mining Manager. Chuck has over 17 years' international experience within the mining and resources industry, including chief technical or senior executive positions in the last seven years.
We now have a technical team in place that has the experience and expertise to deliver a successful and growing business for shareholders. We would like to take this opportunity to thank them and all our employees for their hard work and dedication during what has been a challenging couple of years. We have laid the foundations for a strong and viable copper business, and with their continued support and enthusiasm we are confident that we can generate attractive and sustainable returns for our shareholders.
John Bryant Rod Webster
Chairman Chief Executive Officer
11 October 2011
Table A
Weatherly Mining Namibia : Ore Reserves as at 30 June 2011 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Deposit | Reserve | Reserve Tonnes and Grade | | | Contained Metal | |||||
Category | Tonnes | Cu (%) | Ag (g/t) | Au (g/t) | | | Cu (t) | Ag (kg) | Au (kg) | |
Otjihase | Proven | 2,913,962 | 1.67 | 7.07 | 0.30 | | | 48,688 | 20,623 | 872 |
Probable | 287,600 | 1.01 | 7.57 | 0.15 | | | 2,895 | 2,177 | 42 | |
Total | 3,201,562 | 1.61 | 7.12 | 0.29 | | | 51,583 | 22,800 | 914 | |
| Proven | - | - | - | - | | | - | - | - |
Matchless (West Ext.) | Probable | 695,667 | 1.81 | - | - | | | 12,626 | - | - |
| Total | 695,667 | 1.81 | - | - | | | 12,626 | - | - |
Grand Total (Proven + Probable) | 3,897,229 | 1.65 | 5.85 | 0.23 | | | 64,209 | 22,800 | 914 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Table B
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weatherly Mining Namibia : Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2011 | | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposit | Resource | Insitu Tonnes and Grade | Insitu Metal | |||||||||
Category | Tonnes | Cu (%) | Ag (g/t) | Au (g/t) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | Cu (t) | Ag (kg) | Au (kg) | Pb (kg) | Zn (kg) | |
Otjihase | Measured | 3,474,246 | 2.37 | 8.91 | 0.42 | - | - | 82,272 | 30,956 | 1,464 | - | - |
Indicated | 3,828,064 | 1.94 | 7.76 | 0.32 | - | - | 74,217 | 29,639 | 1,204 | - | - | |
Inferred | 3,718,494 | 1.41 | 5.19 | 0.23 | - | - | 52,335 | 19,293 | 839 | - | - | |
Total | 11,020,804 | 1.89 | 7.24 | 0.32 | - | - | 208,824 | 79,888 | 3,507 | - | - | |
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Matchless | Indicated | 579,716 | 2.13 | - | - | - | - | 12,402 | - | - | - | - |
Western Extension | Inferred | 230,460 | 2.32 | - | - | - | - | 5,346 | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 810,176 | 2.19 | - | - | - | - | 17,748 | - | - | - | - |
Tschudi | Measured | 4,428,000 | 1.10 | 11.15 | - | - | - | 48,490 | 49,359 | - | - | - |
Indicated | 24,416,000 | 0.90 | 11.08 | - | - | - | 218,994 | 270,419 | - | - | - | |
Inferred | 18,874,000 | 0.74 | 9.85 | - | - | - | 140,482 | 185,966 | - | - | - | |
Total | 47,718,000 | 0.86 | 10.59 | - | - | - | 407,966 | 505,744 | - | - | - | |
Tsumeb West | Measured | 35,255 | 2.45 | 13.00 | - | - | - | 864 | 458 | - | - | - |
Indicated | 520,400 | 2.24 | 20.02 | - | - | - | 11,680 | 10,417 | - | - | - | |
Inferred | 413,200 | 1.88 | 16.35 | - | - | - | 7,757 | 6,757 | - | - | - | |
Total | 968,855 | 2.10 | 18.20 | - | - | - | 20,301 | 17,632 | - | - | - | |
Tsumeb Tailings | Measured | 12,000,000 | 0.48 | 12.74 | - | 0.77 | 0.63 | 57,600 | 152,880 | - | 92,400 | 75,600 |
Indicated | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Inferred | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total | 12,000,000 | 0.48 | 12.74 | - | 0.77 | 0.63 | 57,600 | 52,880 | - | 92,400 | 75,600 | |
Grand Total : All Categories | | | | | | | 712,439 | 756,144 | 3,507 | 92,400 | 75,600 |
The directors present their report, together with the group and parent company financial statements and auditor's reports, for the year ended 30 June 2011.
Principal activity and review of the business
The principal activity of Weatherly International plc during the year was to act as a holding company for the group's activities in mining and production of base metals, primarily copper.
The subsidiary and associated undertakings principally affecting the profits or net assets of the group in the year are listed in note 19(a).
A review of business can be found in the Chairman's and Chief Executive's statement and the review of operations.
The directors
The directors during the year ended 30 June 2011 were:
J Bryant (Non-executive Chairman)
R J Webster (Chief Executive Officer)
W G Martinick (Non-executive)
A J Stephens (Non-executive)
Wolf Martinick resigned as Chairman on 14 December 2010 and John Bryant was appointed Chairman, while Alan Stephens became Senior Independent Non-Executive Director.
Going concern
The company expects to generate sufficient funds to operate as a going concern for the next 12 months, based on its current production levels and prevailing market conditions.
Weatherly has passed two significant milestones in the last six months. First, the business has achieved the successful recommissioning of its Central Operations (Otjihase and Matchless mines); and secondly, these operations have passed the significant 'maximum cash out point' in the recommissioning process and have become a financially independent and cash generative business.
Exchange rates and copper prices will continue to have significant impact over the ongoing economics of the projects. The investment decision over the recommissioning of its Central Operations was made with a financial model using the assumptions of a copper price of US$6,600/tonne and an exchange rate of US$1: N$7.6, with base case assumptions of US$5,500/tonne and US$1:N$8.5. If prevailing prices were to deteriorate significantly from these assumptions, the business would reconsider the continuation of the operations.
The business has taken steps to manage its exposure to the commodity markets. It has sold forward approximately 35% of forecast production of copper concentrate at an average price of US$9,565/ tonne of copper, which it is currently delivering into. The group maintains forward contracts extending out to between 15 and 18months. These forward sales were negotiated in an attempt to preserve the profitability of the mines in the face of an economic crisis similar in scale to that of 2008-2009.
The business has a debt financing facility of US$7 million with Louis Dreyfus. The loan is linked to an offtake agreement and is structured with repayment terms linked to the production of concentrate at the Central Operations. The board considers this financing model reduces risk by better matching its debt service obligations with projected cash flows.
Results and dividends
The consolidated loss for the year after taxation was US$0.5 million
Key performance indicators
Production: The Board monitors monthly production against budgeted figures, while management monitors it on a daily basis. Production "head grades" are monitored by management on a shipment basis and the Board monitors ore grades on a monthly basis. For the year ended 30 June 2011, 59,450 tonnes of ore was extracted producing 664 tonnes of copper.
Costs: The board and management monitor actual against budgeted costs on a monthly basis.
Finance: The liquidity requirements of the company are monitored on a weekly basis by management, monthly and quarterly by the board, and semi-annually by external parties.
Key risk factors and mitigations
Human resources: Attracting and retaining key commercial and technical staff will be a major challenge especially in the light of the company's reopening strategies and current market conditions in the resources sector. The company constantly monitors the employment market and offers competitive packages to its employees.
Project development risk: All potential projects are subject to an investment appraisal procedure that involves the board at the key stages of initiation, mandate and sanction. Projects are assessed by their strategic fit and contribution to earnings. All projects are scrutinised for consistency of assumptions and accuracy of modelling prior to presentation to the board.
Commodity and Foreign Exchange Risks: The company's revenues and expenses are affected by changes in the price of copper and exchange rate movements between the US dollar and Namibian dollar.
Management and directors review trends in the copper price and exchange rates on a regular basis when considering the company's risk management strategy.
During the year the company had entered into contracts to sell forward 3,375 tonnes of copper delivered over an 18 month period. At the 30 June 2011, 375 tonnes had been delivered into these contracts.
Forward copper sales: If copper prices were to rise above our forward price and the mines were not able to deliver into these contracts, the group would have a financial obligation.
Risks relating to investing in Namibia
Political: Namibia is considered one of the lowest-risk economies in the African continent. The government pursues a consistent strategy of encouraging investment in the country, and is keen to keep the climate attractive for foreign investors. Weatherly maintains strong links with the President, Prime Minister, Minister for Mines, and other government members and officials. The board reviews the strategic impact of political changes within the country on an ongoing basis. The President of Namibia, Mr.Hifikepunye Pohami, visited London in summer 2011 and held very positive discussions with Weatherly's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Black Economic Empowerment and local participation: There is currently no Black Economic Empowerment legislation embodied in Namibian law; however the government encourages local participation through a number of avenues. Weatherly has adopted a proactive stance in making equity in its projects available to appropriate empowerment groups. Accordingly, we have entered into an agreement with Labour Investment Holdings Inc, the investment arm of the National Union of Namibian Workers, to sell a 2.5% stake in Ongopolo Mining Ltd, Weatherly's wholly owned subsidiary which owns and operates our Namibian mines. There is an option to purchase a further 2.5%. Additionally, discussions are taking place for the Government of Namibia's 5.09% shareholding in Weatherly to be transferred to Epangelo, the state owned mining company. These arrangements will be for the long-term benefit of the community and the company.
Exchange controls: The company maintains a consistent and compliant approach to exchange regulations within Namibia.
Currency and exchange rate fluctuations: Weatherly manages its treasury function through its London office. Treasury balances the needs of the Namibian subsidiary against fluctuations in the currency and optimises transfer through its advisers, drawing down funds on a prudent basis.
Market risk: Future profitability of the group is dependent upon global demand for, and the market price of, copper. We have put agreements in place to sell a proportion of our future production forward, with the aim of providing some shelter in the event of a significant negative movement in the copper price.
At year end the company had outstanding forward contracts equating to approximately 35% of forecast production delivered periodically over 15 months at an average price of US$9,565 per tonne.
Infrastructure: Weatherly's operations are serviced by good regional infrastructure, and the board reviews its infrastructure requirements on an ongoing basis. Any challenges relating to the supply of electricity, water or rail links are incorporated into investment decisions and addressed as needed in the overall projects. Any infrastructure requirements outside the project scope are addressed through dialogue with the government and the relevant parastatal institutions.
Other matters
Section 311 Creditors
On the 31st July 2011 the compromise agreement with the creditors expired and no payments to the creditors were outstanding. Although a judgment had been obtained in the courts in Namibia we have received a legal opinion that the judgment is flawed and the appeal that we have lodged to set it aside should succeed. The matter will be kept under review to consider the appropriate time to release the provision.
Substantial holdings
Shareholdings of 3% and more of the issued share capital of the company were extracted from the shareholders' register at close of business on 30 September 2011 as follows:
Major shareholders | Number of ordinary 0.5p shares | |
Blackrock | 53,175,813 | 10.01% |
Government of Republic of Namibia | 27,364,986 | 5.09% |
R J Webster | 27,343,800 | 5.09% |
Legal & General UK Alpha Trust | 20,000,000 | 3.70% |
W G Martinick | 19,263,200 | 3.60% |
Ezenet Ltd | 18,281,200 | 3.40% |
Post balance sheet events
China Africa Resources listing
During the year we continued our work with East China Minerals Exploration and Development Bureau for Non-Ferrous Metals (ECE) to form the joint venture company. The company, China Africa Resources plc (CAR), was floated on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) of the London Stock Exchange, with the first day of trading on 1 August 2011. ECE has a majority holding in CAR, with 65% of the issued share capital. Weatherly holds 25% and 10% was distributed to Weatherly shareholders as a dividend in specie. Weatherly contributed the Berg Aukas lead/zinc project into the joint venture while ECE put in £4.8million. These funds are to be used firstly on a feasibility study to bring Berg Aukas back into production. The remaining funds are being used in assessing other projects that CAR may develop.
Labour Investment Holdings
On 26 September 2011, Weatherly sold a 2.5 per cent shareholding in its Namibian subsidiary Ongopolo Mining Limited (OML) to Labour Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LIH), the investment arm of the National Union of Namibian Workers.
The sale price for the shares is N$7.2m (approximately US$1 million) and will be provided for through a vendor financing agreement whereby OML will lend LIH the consideration for the shares, and the repayments including interest will be deducted from LIH's future dividends. Under the agreement, LIH also has a five year option to increase its shareholding to 5 per cent. Payment for the second 2.5 per cent tranche would be in cash, with the price based on an independent valuation of OML at the time of exercise.
Future developments
Discussion of future developments can be found in the Chairman's and Chief Executive's statement and the review of operations.
Company's policy on payment of creditors
It is the group's policy to settle terms of payment with suppliers when agreeing the terms of each transaction, to ensure that suppliers are made aware of these terms of payment, and to endeavour to adhere to them. Trade creditors of the group at 30 June 2011 were equivalent to 37 days' purchases (2010: 48 days), based on the average daily amount invoiced by suppliers during the year. The company does not have significant trade creditor balances.
Exchange rates
The following rates have been used in the compilation of the financial statements and notes supporting the accounts:
| Translation | 2011
| 2010
|
|
Year end | 1 GBP - USD | 1.6018 | 1.5067 |
|
Average | 1 GBP - USD | 1.5898 | 1.5789 |
|
Year end | 1 USD - ZAR | 6.8310 | 7.6529 |
|
Average | 1 USD - ZAR | 7.0076 | 7.5904 |
|
Statement of directors' responsibilities - group
The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRSs). Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and profit or loss of the group for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
· select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
· make judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
· state whether applicable IFRSs have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and
· prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
In so far as each of the directors is aware:
· there is no relevant audit information of which the company's auditors are unaware; and
· the directors have taken all steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the company's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Auditor
Grant Thornton UK LLP have expressed their willingness to continue in office as auditor, and a resolution to reappoint them will be proposed at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
On behalf of the board:
Rod Webster
Chief Executive Officer
11 October 2011
Introduction
The board of directors is committed to high standards of corporate governance.
The board is accountable to its shareholders for good governance, and the statement below is based on the review of corporate governance that was carried out by the Audit Committee and describes how the principles of good governance have been applied.
Constitution of the board
During the year ended 30 June 2011, the board was comprised of the following:
John Bryant Chairman (appointed 14 December 2010)
Rod Webster Chief Executive Officer
Alan Stephens Senior Independent Non-executive Director (appointed 14 December 2010)
Wolf Martinick Non-executive Director
Non-executive directors
During the year, the board had three non-executive directors: Alan Stephens, John Bryant, and Wolf Martinick. Wolf Martinick resigned as Chairman on 14 December and was replaced by John Bryant. Wolf Martinick has continued as a non-executive director. Alan Stephens and John Bryant were considered to be 'independent' and, with John Bryant becoming Chairman, Alan Stephens has taken over as the senior independent non-executive director. Due to the size of Wolf Martinick's shareholding of 3.60% and his ability to influence Ezenet Ltd's holding of 3.40%, he is not considered to be an independent director. The relatively small number of share options that has been granted to the other two non-executive directors does not, in the opinion of Weatherly's advisers or its directors, impair their independence.
Committees of the board
The board has three standing committees, each of which has terms of reference setting out its authority and duties, as follows:
The Audit Committee was made up of John Bryant as Chairman and Alan Stephens for the year ended 30 June 2011.
The Audit Committee meets as required. It reviews the financial reports and accounts and the preliminary and interim statements, including the board's statement on internal financial control in the annual report, prior to their submission to the board for approval. The Audit Committee also reviews corporate governance within the group and reports on this to the board. In addition, it assesses the overall performance of the external auditor including scope, cost effectiveness and objectivity of the audit.
The Audit Committee is also charged with reviewing the independence of the external auditor and monitors the level of non-audit fees. These fees are disclosed in note 10 to the accounts. In the opinion of the Audit Committee, which has reviewed these fees and the procedures that Grant Thornton UK LLP have in place to ensure they retain their independence, the auditor's independence is not compromised. The Audit Committee met three times during the period, and John Bryant and Alan Stephens were present on all occasions.
The Audit Committee can meet for private discussion with the external auditor, who attends its meetings as required. The Company Secretary acts as secretary to the committee.
The Remuneration Committee was made up of Alan Stephens as Chairman and John Bryant during the year, with the Company Secretary serving as secretary.
The Remuneration Committee determines, on behalf of the board, the group's policy on executive remuneration and the remuneration packages for executive directors. It also approves and administers the executive share option scheme, the long term incentive plan (LTIP) and the grant of options as part of the remuneration package. The Remuneration Committee met four times during the period, with Alan Stephens and John Bryant in attendance on each occasion.
The Nominations Committee is made up of John Bryant and Rod Webster with either Wolf Martinick or Alan Stephens.
In addition to its role of considering the appointment of directors and senior managers, the Nominations Committee is also charged with reporting to the board on the effectiveness of the board, its sub-committees and its directors, and it does this at the end of the annual audit cycle. The Nominations Committee did not meet formally during the year.
In accordance with the Quoted Companies Alliance Guidance, the board nominated Alan Stephens as the senior independent non-executive director on 14 December 2010 following John Bryant's appointment as Chairman. At the same board meeting, the directors also adopted the guidance on Corporate Governance for AIM Listed Companies by the Quoted Company Alliance and in future will be reporting our performance against the guidance.
Attendance at meetings
During the year, there were a large number of substantive board meetings. Directors' attendance at meetings of the board and its sub-committees during the period was as follows:
John Bryant Board 21/21 Audit Committee 2/2 Remuneration Committee 5/5
Rod Webster Board 21/21
Alan Stephens Board 20/21 Audit Committee 2/2 Remuneration Committee 5/5
Wolf Martinick Board 16/21
Of the 21 board meetings, nine were of a procedural nature and 12 were substantive meetings.
The Nominations Committee did not meet formally during the year; however, such matters that arose within its term of reference were dealt with in full board meetings.
Internal control
The board is responsible for reviewing and approving the adequacy and effectiveness of the group's internal controls, including financial and operational control, risk management and compliance.
In order to establish effective procedures for internal control and communicate these throughout the group, including its subsidiaries, the board has issued two important documents to all staff known as the Board Protocol and the Manual of Internal Control.
The key elements of the group's internal control are set out in these documents, and contain:
· a clearly defined structure for the group, its subsidiaries and management teams;
· powers which the board has reserved to itself. These include the approval of all business plans and budgets for the group and all its subsidiaries, the establishment of subsidiary companies and appointment of directors to them, and the process for project approval and capital expenditure;
· terms of reference for the Audit, Remuneration and Nominations Committees, which define the roles of their members;
· information about how often the board should meet (as a minimum) and an annual cycle of meetings. This covers the process for the preparation of board agendas and board papers, and their prior consideration by the management team at its weekly meetings;
· detailed business plans and budgets to be approved annually and performance monitored by the management team and the board at its monthly meetings; and
· procedures for the approval of expenditure, the levels of authority and the management controls.
The directors acknowledge their responsibility for the group's system of internal financial control and risk management, and place considerable importance on maintaining this. The Manual of Internal Control and the process for authorisation that it imposes, together with the Board Protocol setting out the process for authorising business plans, budgets and projects, form an important part of our decision-making process; however, this can only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against material errors, losses or fraud.
There is currently no internal audit function within the group owing to the small size of the administrative function. However, there is a high level of review by directors and a clear requirement for them to authorise transactions. Should the need for a separate internal audit function become apparent, the board will establish one.
The Board Protocol and the Manual of Internal Control have both been updated and refined as Weatherly's business evolves and grows.
Bribery Act compliance
In response to the introduction of the Bribery Act 2010 and in order to ensure compliance, the Board approved a suite of documentation that included a policy statement on anti-corruption and bribery, a code of conduct for employees, a set of management procedures, a note defining responsibilities within the company and an implementation plan which has been rolled out in the company. Progress on the implementation has been reported to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee noted that documentation had been circulated and meetings to explain the procedures had been held with all staff and contractors on site including our operating mines in Namibia. Notices had been displayed at our locations with the 'whistle blowing' procedure. The implementation and effectiveness of these procedures will be continually monitored and reported to the board.
Relations with shareholders
The company endeavours to maintain regular communications with shareholders through regulatory announcements, via the Weatherly International website and by direct contact with its major shareholders. Rod Webster has also participated in conference calls with groups of smaller shareholders. The board values the views of its shareholders and fosters continuing dialogue with investment and fund managers, other investors and equity analysts to ensure that the investing community receives an informed view of the group's prospects, plans and progress.
Remuneration Committee
The company has established a Remuneration Committee which is constituted in accordance with the recommendations of the UK Corporate Governance Code (June 2010). The members of the Committee for the year ended 30 June 2011 were Alan Stephens and John Bryant, who are both independent non-executive directors, and the Committee was chaired by Alan Stephens.
Neither member of the Committee has any personal financial interest (other than as a shareholder), conflicts of interests arising from cross-directorships, or day-to-day involvement in running the business. The Committee makes recommendations to the board. No director plays a part in any discussion about his own remuneration.
In determining the directors' remuneration for the year, the Committee consulted Rod Webster (Chief Executive) and Max Herbert (Company Secretary) about its proposals. The Committee also appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers to provide options valuation advice.
Remuneration policy for the executive directors
Executive remuneration packages are designed to attract, motivate and retain directors of the highest calibre to lead the company and to reward them for enhancing value to shareholders. The performance management of the executive directors and key members of senior management, and the determination of their annual remuneration package, are undertaken by the Committee.
There are five main elements of the remuneration package for executive directors and senior management:
· Basic annual salary
· Benefits-in-kind
· Annual bonus payments
· Share option incentives
· Pension arrangements.
The company's policy is that a substantial proportion of the remuneration of the executive directors should be performance-related. Executive directors may earn an annual bonus payment together with the benefits of participation in share option schemes.
Basic salary
An executive director's basic salary is reviewed by the Committee prior to the beginning of each year and when an individual changes position or responsibility. In deciding appropriate levels, the Committee considers the group as a whole and relies on objective research which gives up-to-date information on a comparator group of companies. In considering the Chief Executive's basic salary, the Remuneration Committee took into account his extended role since the departure of the Chief Financial Officer and the lack of executive support.
Benefits-in-kind
The executive director receives benefits-in-kind, principally private medical insurance.
Annual bonus payments
The Committee establishes the objectives that must be met for each financial year if a cash bonus is to be paid. In setting appropriate bonus parameters, the Committee refers to the objective research on a comparator group of companies, as noted above. The Committee believes that any compensation awarded should be tied to the interests of the company's shareholders and that the principal measure of those interests is total shareholder return. Account is also taken of the relative success of the different parts of the business for which the executive directors are responsible and the extent to which the strategic objectives set by the board are being met. The maximum performance-related bonus that can be achieved is 100% per cent of basic annual salary. The strategic objectives, control system and indicators are also aligned to total shareholder return.
Share options
The company has issued share options to its staff under two incentive schemes: an unapproved share option scheme and a long term incentive plan. The Remuneration Committee has responsibility for the administration of these schemes and the grant of options under its terms. This includes setting the performance criteria that must be met and the strike price of the options, which is at a premium to market price at the time of grant. The details of these awards are set out below and their accounting treatment is dealt with in note 31 to the financial statements.
On 11 October 2011, the directors agreed to change the rules of the Weatherly International plc 2006 unapproved share option plan under the terms of Rule 25 so that under Rule 23 invested share options that have been awarded will vest immediately on a change of control of ownership of the business.
Pension arrangements
Executive directors receive pension contributions to their own private pension schemes.
Directors' contracts
All the directors have signed contracts with the company. Rod Webster's appointment does not have a fixed term but is subject to 12 months' notice by either party. The non-executive directors are appointed for a fixed term, John Bryant and Wolf Martinick for two years and Alan Stephens three years. These may be terminated by giving two months' notice, without compensation for loss of office. All newly appointed directors are required to offer themselves for election at the next Annual General Meeting of the company and their appointments are subject to them being so elected. Non-executive remuneration is determined by the board within the limits set by the Articles of Association and is based on independent salary surveys of fees paid to non-executive directors of similar companies. The basic fee paid to each non-executive director in the year was £30,000. The non-executive directors receive further fees for additional work performed for the company on the basis of the number of additional days worked.
Aggregate directors' remuneration
The total amounts for directors' remuneration, paid by Weatherly International plc and its subsidiaries, were as follows:
| Salary and |
| Bonus |
| Benefits- |
| Pension |
| Total |
| fees |
|
|
| In-kind |
|
|
|
|
| US$'000 |
| US$'000 |
| US$'000 |
| US$'000 |
| US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R J Webster | 363 |
| - |
| 4 |
| 61 |
| 428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-executive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W G Martinick | 56 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Bryant | 80 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Stephens | 80 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 579 |
| - |
| 4 |
| 61 |
| 644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R J Webster | 359 |
| 53 |
| 3 |
| 51 |
| 466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-executive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W G Martinick | 63 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Bryant | 81 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Stephens | 89 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 592 |
| 53 |
| 3 |
| 51 |
| 699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors' share options
Aggregate emoluments disclosed above do not include any amounts for the value of options to acquire ordinary shares in the company granted to or held by the directors. Details of the options during the year are as follows:
Name of director | 30 June 2010 |
| Warrants/ options issued/(expired) |
|
| 30 June 2011 | Warrant/option price pence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R J Webster | 1,248,489 |
| (1,248,489) |
|
| - |
|
| 1,248,491 |
| (1,248,491) |
|
| - |
|
| 2,500,000 |
|
|
|
| 2,500,000 | 3.0 |
W G Martinick | 1,248,490 |
| (1,248,490) |
|
| - |
|
| 1,248,488 |
| (1,248,488) |
|
| - |
|
| 750,000 |
|
|
|
| 750,000 | 3.0 |
J Bryant | 750,000 |
|
|
|
| 750,000 | 3.0 |
A Stephens | 750,000 |
|
|
|
| 750,000 | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9,743,958 |
| (4,993,958) |
|
| 4,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Each director's options are exercisable one third on 1/4/2011, one third on 1/4/2012, and one third on 1/4/2013, and remain exercisable over a 10-year period.
The share price movements during the year were as follows: high of 15 pence, low of 2.6 pence and a closing share price at 30 June 2011 of 9.5 pence.
There have been no variations to the terms and conditions or performance criteria for share options during the financial year.
Approval
This report was approved by the board of directors on 11 October 2011 and signed on its behalf by:
Rod Webster
Chief Executive Officer
We have audited the group financial statements of Weatherly International plc for the year ended 30 June 2011 which comprise the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, Consolidated Cash Flow Statementand the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement the directors are responsible for the preparation of the group financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the group financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's (APB's) Ethical Standards for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
A description of the scope of an audit of financial statements is provided on the APB's website at www.frc.org.uk/apb/scope/private.cfm.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the group financial statements:
· give a true and fair view of the state of the group's affairs as at 30 June 2011 and of its loss for the year then ended;
· have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the European Union; and
· have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006
Opinion on other matter prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion the information given in the Directors' Report, in the financial year for which the group financial statements are prepared is consistent with the group financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
· certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or
· we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Other matter
We have reported separately on the parent company financial statements of Weatherly International plc for the year ended 30 June 2011.
Nicholas Page
Senior Statutory Auditor
for and on behalf of Grant Thornton UK LLP
Statutory Auditor, Chartered Accountants
Gatwick
11 October 2011
For the year ended 30 June 2011
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| Note | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Revenue | 5 | | 16 | | 145 |
Cost of sales | | | (4,714) | | (5,405) |
| | | | | |
Gross loss | | | (4,698) | | (5,260) |
| | | | | |
Other operating income | 6 | | 184 | | 275 |
Administrative expenses | | | (4,111) | | (5,819) |
Profit/(loss) on sales of assets | 9 | | 660 | | (246) |
| | | | | |
Operating loss | 9 | | (7,965) | | (11,050) |
| | | | | |
Profit on settlement of noteholder loans | | | - | | 559 |
Profit on disposal of investments | 19(c) | | 6,828 | | - |
Settlement of compound financial instrument | | | - | | 469 |
Foreign exchange gain | | | 227 | | 316 |
Finance costs | 13 | | (188) | | (1,291) |
Finance income | 12 | | 52 | | 19 |
| | | | | |
Loss on continuing operations | | | (1,046) | | (10,978) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Profit from discontinued operations | 8 | | 508 | | 20,047 |
| | | | | |
(Loss)/profit for the year before taxation | | | (538) | | 9,069 |
| | | | | |
Income tax expense | 14 | | - | | - |
| | | | | |
(Loss)/profit for the year | | | (538) | | 9,069 |
| | | | | |
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | | | 2,702 | | (68) |
Fair value movement of investments in the year | 19(c) | | 4,675 | | 2,153 |
Reclassification adjustment on disposal of investments | 19(c) | | (6,828) | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Other comprehensive income for the year net of tax | | 549 | | 2,085 | |
| | | | | |
Total comprehensive income for the year | | | 11 | | 11,154 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
(Loss)/profit attributable to: | | | | | |
Owners of the parent | | | (535) | | 9,307 |
Non- controlling interests | | | (3) | | (238) |
| | | (538) | | 9,069 |
| | | | | |
Total comprehensive income attributable to: | | | | | |
Owners of the parent | | | 14 | | 11,392 |
Non- controlling interests | | | (3) | | (238) |
| | | 11 | | 11,154 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total and continuing (loss)/earnings per share | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Basic (loss)/earnings per share (US cents) | | | | | |
Loss from continuing activities | 16 | | (0.21c) | | (2.43c) |
Earnings from discontinued activities | 16 | | 0.10c | | 4.53c |
| | | | | |
Total | 16 | | (0.11c) | | 2.10c |
| | | | | |
Diluted (loss)/earnings per share (US cents) | | | | | |
Loss from continuing activities | 16 | | (0.21c) | | (2.43c) |
Earnings from discontinued activities | 16 | | 0.10c | | 4.53c |
| | | | | |
Total | 16 | | (0.11c) | | 2.10c |
The notes form part of these financial statements.
At 30 June 2011
| | | As at | | As at |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| Note | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Assets | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | 18 | | 32,819 | | 22,803 |
Intangible assets | 17 | | 414 | | 3 |
Investment in associates | 19 (b) | | 57 | | - |
| | | | | |
Total non-current assets | | | 33,290 | | 22,806 |
| | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | |
Investments | 19 (c) | | - | | 7,724 |
Inventories | 21 | | 3,367 | | 52 |
Trade and other receivables | 22 | | 2,922 | | 579 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 23 | | 9,091 | | 6,984 |
| | | | | |
| | | 15,380 | | 15,339 |
Non-current assets held for sale | 20 | | 1,197 | | 3,764 |
| | | | | |
| | | 16,577 | | 19,103 |
| | | | | |
Total assets | | | 49,867 | | 41,909 |
| | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | |
Trade and other payables | 25 | | 4,364 | | 10,574 |
Unsecured payables subject to a compromise on acquisition | 25 | | 3,223 | | 3,118 |
Loans | 24 | | 5,548 | | - |
| | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 13,135 | | 13,692 |
| | | | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | | | |
Unsecured payables subject to a compromise on acquisition | 26 | | 1,964 | | 1,900 |
Loans | 24 | | 6,120 | | - |
Provisions | 27 | | 293 | | 262 |
| | | | | |
Total non-current liabilities | | | 8,377 | | 2,162 |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 21,512 | | 15,854 |
| | | | | |
Net assets | | | 28,355 | | 26,055 |
| | | | | |
Equity | | | | | |
Issued capital | 28 | | 4,581 | | 3,860 |
Share premium | | | 6,092 | | - |
Merger reserve | | | 18,471 | | 18,471 |
Share-based payments reserve | | | 303 | | 556 |
Foreign exchange reserve | | | (6,989) | | (9,691) |
Retained earnings | | | 6,138 | | 13,097 |
| | | | | |
Equity attributable to shareholders of the parent company | | | 28,596 | | 26,293 |
Non-controlling interests | 29 | | (241) | | (238) |
| | | | | |
| | | 28,355 | | 26,055 |
| | | | | |
On behalf of the board:
R J Webster
Chief Executive Officer
Approved by the board on 11 October 2011
The notes form part of these financial statements.
For the year ended 30 June 2011
| Issued capital | Share premium | Merger reserve | Capital redemption reserve | Share-based payment reserve | Foreign exchange reserve | Other reserve | Retained earnings | Total | Non-controlling interests | Total equity |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at 30 June 2009 | 3,527 | 71,729 | 18,471 | 454 | 1,413 | (9,606) | (469) | (65,208) | 20,311 | - | 20,311 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Issue of share capital | 333 | 1,667 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,000 | - | 2,000 |
Capital reduction | - | (73,396) | - | (454) | - | - | - | 73,850 | - | - | - |
Share-based payments | - | - | - | - | 314 | - | - | - | 314 | - | 314 |
Lapsed options and warrants | - | - | - | - | (1,171) | - | - | 1,171 | - | - | - |
Dividend | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (7,724) | (7,724) | - | (7,724) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Transactions with owners | 333 | (71,729) | - | (454) | (857) | - | - | 67,297 | (5,410) | - | (5,410) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Profit/(loss) for the period | - | - | - | - | - | (17) | 469 | 8,855 | 9,307 | (238) | 9,069 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | - | - | - | - | - | (68) | - | - | (68) | - | (68) |
Fair value movement in investments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,153 | 2,153 | - | 2,153 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income for the year | - | - | - | - | - | (85) | 469 | 11,008 | 11,392 | (238) | 11,154 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at 30 June 2010 | 3,860 | - | 18,471 | - | 556 | (9,691) | - | 13,097 | 26,293 | (238) | 26,055 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Issue of share capital | 721 | 6,092 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6,813 | - | 6,813 |
Share-based payments | - | - | - | - | 151 | - | - | - | 151 | - | 151 |
Lapsed options and warrants | - | - | - | - | (404) | - | - | 404 | - | - | - |
Dividend | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (4,675) | (4,675) | - | (4,675) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Transactions with owners | 721 | 6,092 | - | - | (253) | - | - | (4,271) | 2,289 | - | 2,289 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Profit/(loss) for the period | - | - | - | - | - | | | (535) | (535) | (3) | (538) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | - | - | - | - | - | 2,702 | - | - | 2,702 | - | 2,702 |
Fair value movement in investments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4,675 | 4,675 | - | 4,675 |
Recycling of investment fair value through profit and loss | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (6,828) | (6,828) | - | (6,828) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income for the year | - | - | - | - | - | 2,702 | - | (2,688) | 14 | (3) | 11 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at 30 June 2011 | 4,581 | 6,092 | 18,471 | - | 303 | (6,989) | - | 6,138 | 28,596 | (241) | 28,355 |
The notes on form part of these financial statements.
For the year ended 30 June 2011
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| Note | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | |
(Loss)/profit for the year | | | (538) | | 9,069 |
Adjusted by: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | 3,714 | | 4,978 |
Reverse impairment of development expenditure | 35 | | (2,240) | | - |
Profit on disposal of discontinued businesses | 8 | | (621) | | (29,229) |
Provisions created | | | - | | 262 |
Profit on disposal of Dundee Precious Metals shares | | | (6,828) | | - |
Share-based payment expenses | | | 153 | | 314 |
Profit on sale of assets | | | (660) | | (125) |
Profit on settlement of noteholder loans | | | - | | (559) |
Settlement of compound financial instrument | | | - | | (469) |
FX transfer on disposal | | | - | | 17 |
Finance costs | | | 188 | | 1,291 |
Interest received | | | (52) | | (19) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | (6,884) | | (14,470) |
Movements in working capital | | | | | |
(Increase)/decrease in inventories | | | (3,315) | | 263 |
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables | | | (2,343) | | (1,189) |
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables | | | 1,434 | | 5,557 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | (11,108) | | (9,839) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows generated from investing activities | | | | | |
Interest received | | | 52 | | 19 |
Payments for property, plant and equipment | | | (9,294) | | (1,750) |
Payments for evaluation of feasibility studies | 17 | | (414) | | - |
Proceeds from disposal of discontinued businesses | 8 | | 3,202 | | 17,370 |
Costs of disposing of the discontinued business | | | - | | (574) |
Receipts from sales of property, plant and equipment | | | 1,398 | | - |
Investment in associates | | | (57) | | - |
Proceeds from sale of EML options | | | - | | 260 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net cash used/(generated) from investing activities | | | (5,113) | | 15,325 |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | |
Proceeds from issue of equity shares | 28 | | 6,813 | | 2,000 |
Receipts from loans | | | 11,668 | | 2,953 |
Payment guarantee | | | (1,340) | | - |
Interest paid and finance charges | | | (188) | | (2,556) |
Convertible loan note repayment | | | - | | (3,000) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net cash generated/(used) by financing activities | | | 16,953 | | (603) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Increase in cash | | | 732 | | 4,883 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Reconciliation to net cash | | | | | |
Net cash at 1 July | | | 6,984 | | 2,048 |
Increase in cash | | | 732 | | 4,883 |
Foreign exchange gains | | | 35 | | 53 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net cash at 30 June | 23 | | 7,751 | | 6,984 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The notes form part of these financial statements.
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
For the year ended 30 June 2011
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND GENERAL INFORMATION
Weatherly International plc and subsidiaries' ("the group's") principal activities include the mining and sale of copper.
Weatherly International plc is the group's ultimate parent company. It is incorporated and domiciled in England. The address of Weatherly International plc's registered office, which is also its principal place of business, is 180 Piccadilly, London W1J 9HF. Weatherly International plc's shares are listed on the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange.
Weatherly International's financial statements are presented in United States dollars (US$), which is also the functional currency of the parent company.
These consolidated financial statements were approved for issue by the board of directors on 11 October 2011.
2. STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS NOT YET APPLIED BY THE GROUP
2.1 Overall considerations
The company has adopted the new interpretations, revisions and amendments to IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, which are relevant to and effective for the company's financial statements for the annual period beginning 1 July 2010.
The adoption had no significant effects on current, prior or future periods due to the first-time application of these new requirements in respect of presentation, recognition and measurement. An overview of relevant new standards, amendments and interpretations to IFRS's issued but not yet effective is given in note 2.3.
2.2 Standards, amendments and interpretations of International Financial Reporting Standards effective for the first time for the year ended 30 June 2010 that are relevant to the group
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Standard number and title | | Effective summary | | Effective date | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 2 | | | | | Amendments relating to group cash-settled share-based payment transactions - clarity of the definition of the term "Group", and where in a group share-based payments must be accounted for | | | |||||
Share-based payments | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | 1 January 2010 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 5 | | | | | | | | | | | ||
Non-current assets | | Disclosures of non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held-for-sale or discontinued operations | | | ||||||||
held-for-sale and | | | | 1 January 2010 | ||||||||
discontinued operations | | | | | | | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 1 | | | | | Current/non-current classification of convertible instruments | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
Presentation of | | | | | | | | | | |||
financial statements | | Clarification of statement of changes in equity | | 1 January 2011 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 7 | | | | | | | | | | | ||
Statement of cash flows | | Classification of expenditures on unrecognised assets | | 1 January 2010 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 17 | | | | | Classification of leases of land and buildings | | 1 January 2010 | |||||
Leases | | | | | | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 21 | | | | | Consequential amendments from changes to IAS 27 Consolidated and separate financial statements (Clarification on the transition rules in respect of the disposal or partial disposal of an interest in a foreign operation) | | | |||||
The effects of changes in | | | | |||||||||
foreign exchange rates | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | 1 July 2010 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 27 | | | | | Transition requirements for amendments arising as a result of IAS 27 Consolidated and separate financial statements | | 1 July 2010 | |||||
Consolidated and separate | | | ||||||||||
financial statements | | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 28 | | | | | Consequential amendments from changes to IAS 27 Consolidated and separate financial statements (Clarification on the transition rules in respect of the disposal or partial disposal of an interest in a foreign operation) | | | |||||
Investments in associates | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | 1 July 2010 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 31 | | | | | Consequential amendments from changes to IAS 27 Consolidated and separate financial statements (Clarification on the transition rules in respect of the disposal or partial disposal of an interest in a foreign operation) | | | |||||
Interests in joint ventures | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | 1 July 2010 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 36 | | | | | Unit of accounting for goodwill impairment test | | 1 January 2010 | |||||
Impairment of assets | | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 39 | | | | | Treating loan prepayment penalties as closely related embedded derivatives | | | |||||
Financial instruments: | | | 1 January 2010 | |||||||||
Recognition and | | | | | | | | | ||||
measurement | | | | Scope exemption for business combination contracts | | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Cash flow hedge accounting | | 1 January 2010 | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2.3 Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective and have not been adopted early by the company
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, certain new standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards have been published but are not yet effective, and have not been adopted early by the company.
Management anticipates that all of the pronouncements will be adopted in the company's accounting policy for the first period beginning after the effective date of the pronouncement. The new standards and interpretations are not expected to have a material impact on the company's financial statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | Annual periods |
| | | | | | | | | | | | beginning |
Standard | | | | Details of amendment | | on or after | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 3 | | | | | Amendments to transition requirements for contingent consideration from a business combination that occurred before the effective date of the revised IFRS | | | |||||
Business combinations | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | 1 January 2011 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Clarification on the measurement of non-controlling interests | | 1 January 2011 | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Additional guidance provided on unreplaced and voluntarily replaced share-based payment awards | | | |||
| | | | | | | | 1 January 2011 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 7 | | | | | Amendment clarifies the intended interaction between qualitative and quantitative disclosures of the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and removes some disclosure items which were seen to be superfluous or misleading. | | | |||||
Financial instruments: | | | | |||||||||
Disclosures | | | | | | |||||||
| | | | | | | | 1 January 2011 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Amendments require additional disclosure on transfer transactions of financial assets, including the possible effects of any residual risks that the transferring entity retains. The amendments also require additional disclosures if a disproportionate amount of transfer transactions are undertaken around the end of a reporting period. | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | 1 July 2011 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 9 | | | | | New standard that forms the first part of a three-part project to replace IAS 39 Financial instruments: Recognition and measurement | | | |||||
Financial instruments | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | 1 January 2015 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 10 | | | | New standard that replaces the consolidation requirements in SIC-12 Consolidation - Special purpose entities and IAS 27 Consolidated and separate financial statements. The standard builds on existing principles by identifying the concept of control as the determining factor in whether an entity should be included within the consolidated financial statements of the parent company and provides additional guidance to assist in the determination of control where this is difficult to assess. | | | ||||||
Consolidated | | | | | | |||||||
financial statements | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | 1 January 2015 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 11 | | | | New standard that deals with the accounting for joint arrangements and focuses on the rights and obligations of the arrangement, rather than its legal form. The standard requires a single method for accounting for interests in jointly controlled entities. | | | ||||||
Joint arrangements | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | 1 January 2015 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 12 | | | | New and comprehensive standard on disclosure requirements for all forms of interests in other entities, including joint arrangements, associates, special purpose vehicles and other off balance sheet vehicles. | | | ||||||
Disclosure of interests | | | | |||||||||
in other entities | | | | | | |||||||
| | | | | | | | 1 January 2015 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS 13 | |
New guidance on fair value measurement and disclosure requirements | | | ||||||||
Fair value measurement | | | 1 January 2015 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 12 | Income taxes | | Rebuttable presumption introduced that an investment property will be recovered in its entirety through sale | | | |||||||
| | | | | | | | 1 January 2012 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 24 | | | | | Simplification of the disclosure requirements for government-related entities | | | |||||
Related party disclosures | | | 1 January 2011 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Clarification of the definition of a related party | | 1 January 2011 | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 27 | Consolidated and | | Consequential amendments resulting from the issue of IFRS 10, 11 and 12 | | | |||||||
| | | separate financial | | | 1 January 2015 | ||||||
| | | statements | | | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
IAS 28 | | | | | Consequential amendments resulting from the issue of IFRS 10, 11 and 12 | | | |||||
Investments in associates | | | 1 January 2015 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS 9, IFRS 10, IFRS 11, IFRS 12, IFRS 13, IAS 27 and IAS 28. Initial indications suggest that these standards are not expected to have a significant impact on its financial statements.
Based on the company's current business model and accounting policies, management does not expect material impacts on the company's financial statements when the new Standards and Interpretations become effective.
The company does not intend to apply any of these pronouncements early.
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of preparation
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.
The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the revaluation of certain properties and financial instruments. The principal accounting policies are summarised below and are consistent in all material respects with those applied in the previous year, except as otherwise noted.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the company and entities controlled by the company (its subsidiaries) made up to 30 June each year. Control is achieved where the company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an investee entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.
Non-controlling interests in the net assets of consolidated subsidiaries are identified separately from the group's equity therein. Non-controlling interests consist of the amount of those interests at the date of the original business combination (see below) and the amount in excess of the non-controlling interests' share of changes in equity since the date of the combination. Losses applicable to the non-controlling interests in excess of the non-controlling interests in the subsidiary's equity are allocated to the non-controlling interest.
The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated profit and loss from the effective date of acquisition or up to the effective date of disposal, as appropriate.
Where necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring the accounting policies used into line with those used by the group.
All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses and intra-group unrealised profits and losses are eliminated on consolidation.
Business combinations
Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method. The purchase method involves the recognition of the acquiree's identifiable assets and liabilities, including contingent liabilities, regardless of whether they were recorded in the financial statements prior to acquisition. On initial recognition, the assets and liabilities of the acquired subsidiary are included in the consolidated statement of financial position at their fair values, which are also used as the bases for subsequent measurement in accordance with the group's accounting policies. Goodwill is stated after separating out identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the group's share of the identifiable net assets of the acquiree at the date of acquisition. Any excess of identifiable net assets over the fair value of the consideration transferred is recognised in profit or loss immediately after acquisition.
The share of non-controlling interests in the acquiree is initially measured at the non-controlling interests' proportion of the net fair value of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognised.
Intangible assets
Computer software
Computer software is accounted for using the cost model, whereby capitalised costs are amortised on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives (three years), as these are considered finite. Purchased software and the direct cost associated with the customisation and installation thereof is capitalised. Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the cost incurred to acquire and install the specific software.
Costs associated with maintaining computer software, i.e., expenditure relating to patches and other minor updates as well as their installation, are expensed as incurred.
The amortisation charge reported in profit and loss is included in the profit and loss line item "administrative expenses". Expenditure incurred to restore or maintain the originally assessed future economic benefits of existing software systems is recognised in profit and loss.
Exploration and evaluation costs
Expenditure on advances to companies solely for exploration activities and the group's own regional exploration activities prior to evaluation are capitalised, unless no further future benefit is considered likely where-upon it is written off to profit and loss. Exploration expenditure to define mineralisation at existing ore bodies or within the vicinity of existing ore bodies is considered mine development cost and transferred to property, plant and equipment upon achieving a bankable feasibility study.
Revenue recognition
Revenue represents the amounts derived from the sale of copper and other metals in the production of copper which fall within the Company's ordinary activities, stated net of value added tax. Sales of goods are recognised when goods are delivered and title has passed.
Copper Concentrate sales are provisionally priced based on spot prices at the time of sale, and provisional assays indicating the amount of metal within the concentrate. The final revenue varies according to the price at the end of the quotational period and the final agreed assay results. This final agreement can take between 30 and 150 days after delivery to the customer. Ninety-five percent (95%) of the initial valuation is paid on delivery with the balance paid on final agreement of prices.
The company currently mitigates commodity price risk by maintaining forward sales for a period of 18 months of 35% of the sales value of copper. In addition the company currently elects to fix all remaining contained copper in each lot in multiples of 25 tonne. This result is that less than 25 tonnes of copper per lot is open to price variations.
Turnover is initially recognised when the goods are delivered and title has passed. At each reporting date the provisionally priced metals marked to market based on the forward selling price for the quotational period stipulated in the contract until the quotational period expires. For this purpose, the selling price can be measured reliably for those products, such as copper, for which there exists an active and freely traded commodity market such as the London Metals Exchange and the value of product sold by the Group is directly linked to the form in which it is traded on that market.
Interest income is reported using the effective interest method. Dividends received are recognised when the right to receive payment is established.
Leases
Operating leases
Where the group is a lessee in a lease which does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership from the lessor to the group, the total lease payments are charged to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
Group as a lessor
Assets leased out under operating leases are included in property, plant and equipment and investment property in the balance sheet. They are depreciated over their expected useful lives on a basis consistent with similar owned property, plant and equipment. Rental income (net of any incentives given to lessees) is recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Foreign currency translation
The individual financial statements of each group company are presented in the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates (its functional currency). For the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position of each group company are expressed in US dollars, which is the functional currency of the company and the presentation currency for the consolidated financial statements.
In preparing the financial statements of the individual companies, transactions in currencies other than the entity's functional currency (foreign currencies) are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Non-monetary items carried at fair value that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not retranslated. Exchange differences arising, if any, are recognised in profit or loss.
Exchange differences are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they arise except for:
· exchange differences which relate to assets under construction for future productive use, which are included in the cost of those assets when they are regarded as an adjustment to interest costs on foreign currency borrowings;
· exchange differences on monetary items receivable from or payable to a foreign operation for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur, which form part of the net investment in a foreign operation, and which are recognised in other comprehensive income and reclassified from equity to profit or loss on disposal of the net investment.
On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities are recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in the group's foreign currency translation reserve. On disposal of a foreign operation, the cumulative amount of exchange differences relating to that operation is reclassified from equity to profit or loss.
Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets, which are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale, are added to the cost of those assets until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale.
All other borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they are incurred.
Income taxes
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported profit or loss because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The group's liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences, and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if
the temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, and interest in joint ventures, except where the group is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is expected that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. In addition, tax losses available to be carried forward as well as other income tax credits to the group are assessed for recognition as deferred tax assets.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised. Deferred tax is charged or credited in profit or loss, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. Tax relating to items recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in other comprehensive income.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
Property, plant and equipment
Non-mining assets
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost net of accumulated depreciation and any provision for impairment. Depreciation is provided using the straight line method to write off the cost of the asset less any residual value over its useful economic life as follows:
Freehold buildings 15 years
Plant and machinery 3 to 15 years
Development costs life of mine
Freehold land not depreciated
Development and production expenditure
When exploration and evaluation work shows a mine to be commercially viable, the accumulated costs are transferred to property, plant and equipment. Mining plant and equipment consist of buildings, plant and machinery, which are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the life of the mine.
Mining property for mines in production, including pre-stripping costs, is written off on a unit of production basis over the life of the mine.
Asset residual values and useful lives are reviewed annually and amended as necessary. Assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the fixed asset may not be recoverable. An asset's carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset's carrying amount exceeds the higher of the asset's fair value less costs to sell or value in use.
Development costs relating to major programmes at the existing mines are capitalised. These costs consist primarily of expenditure to expand the capacity of the operating mine. Day-to-day mine development costs to maintain production are expensed as incurred. Initial development and production costs on a new mine, which include site establishment costs, are capitalised until production reaches commercial production which is defined as 60% of budgeted steady state production, at which time the accumulated costs are transferred to property, plant and equipment. Mining plant and equipment consists of buildings, plant and machinery, which are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the life of the mine.
Impairment
At each balance sheet date, the group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is tested for impairment annually and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.
The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised as an expense immediately.
Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised as income immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value, using the average cost principle. Cost includes all direct expenditure and related overheads incurred to the balance sheet date. Cost is determined on the following bases:
· Copper concentrate is valued at the average total production cost at the relevant stage of production; and
· Consumable stores are valued on a moving average cost basis.
Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the cost of completion and selling expenses.
During periods of abnormally low production such as during start up, production cost are arrived at based on allocating costs on the normal capacity of the operation.
Financial instruments, assets and liabilities
The group uses financial instruments comprising cash, trade receivables, trade payables, convertible debt, derivatives and other equity investments that arise from its operations.
Financial assets
Financial assets are divided into the following categories: loans and receivables; financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, and available-for-sale financial assets. Financial assets are assigned to the different categories by management on initial recognition, depending on the purpose for which they were acquired.
All financial assets are recognised when the group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets other than those categorised as at fair value through profit or loss are recognised at fair value plus transaction costs. Financial assets categorised as at fair value through profit or loss are recognised initially at fair value with transaction costs expensed through profit or loss.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss include financial assets that are held for trading, which include derivatives. Subsequent to initial recognition, the financial assets included in this category are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Trade receivables are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are measured subsequent to initial recognition at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less provision for impairment. Any change in their value through impairment or reversal of impairment is recognised in profit or loss.
Provision against trade receivables is made when there is objective evidence that the group will not be able to collect all amounts due to it in accordance with the original terms of those receivables. The amount of the write-down is determined as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted using the original effective interest rate.
Available-for-sale financial assets include non-derivative financial assets that are either designated as such or do not qualify for inclusion in any of the other categories of financial assets. All financial assets within this category are measured subsequently at fair value, with changes in value recognised in other comprehensive income. Gains and losses arising from investments classified as available-for-sale are reclassified from equity to profit or loss when they are sold or when the investment is impaired.
In the case of impairment of available-for-sale assets, any loss previously recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassified from equity to profit or loss. Impairment losses recognised in the profit and loss on equity instruments are not reversed through profit or loss. Impairment losses recognised previously on debt securities are reversed through profit or loss when the increase can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in profit or loss.
An assessment for impairment is undertaken at least at each balance sheet date.
A financial asset is derecognised only where the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or the financial asset is transferred and that transfer qualifies for derecognition. A financial asset is transferred if the contractual rights to receive the cash flows of the asset have been transferred or the group retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flows of the asset but assumes a contractual obligation to pay the cash flows to one or more recipients. A financial asset that is transferred qualifies for derecognition if the group transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset, or if the group neither retains nor transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership but does transfer control of that asset.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and demand deposits, together with other short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value less bank overdrafts repayable on demand.
Financial liabilities
The group's financial liabilities include bank overdrafts, loans, unsecured creditors, convertible debt and trade and other payables.
Financial liabilities are obligations to pay cash or other financial assets and are recognised when the group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial liabilities categorised as at fair value through profit or loss are recorded initially at fair value, and all transaction costs are recognised immediately in profit or loss. All other financial liabilities are recorded initially at fair value, net of direct issue costs.
Finance charges, including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are charged to profit or loss on an accruals basis using the effective interest method and are added to the carrying amount of the instrument to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which they arise.
Financial liabilities are categorised as at fair value through profit or loss where they are classified as held-for-trading or designated as at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition. Such liabilities are measured at fair value. A financial liability is derecognised only when the obligation is extinguished, that is, when the obligation is discharged or cancelled or expires.
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at the fair value net of issue costs associated with the borrowing. After initial recognition, loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any issue costs and any discount or premium on settlement. Gains and losses on derecognition are recognised in finance charges.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is that rate which exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability or, where appropriate, a shorter period.
Trade payables are recognised initially at their fair value and subsequently measured at amortised costs less settlement payments.
The unsecured convertible debt comprises both a liability and an equity component. The elements are classified in accordance with their contractual provisions. At the date of issue, the liability component is recorded at fair value, which is estimated using the prevailing market interest rate for a similar debt instrument without the equity frame. Thereafter, the liability component is accounted for as a financial liability in accordance with the above. The residual is the equity component, which is accounted for as an equity instrument.
Equity
An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all its liabilities. Equity instruments are recorded at the proceeds received net of direct issue costs. The group has in issue only ordinary shares and the conditions of the shares are such that they are accounted for as equity.
Derivative financial instruments
The group uses derivative financial instruments including forward contracts to economically hedge its risks associated with commodity price fluctuations. The gain or loss on the forward contract is recognised in profit or loss in the period in which it matures. If the contract becomes onerous by the group not being able to meet its obligations, the difference between the forward price and spot price is debited to profit or loss.
Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the present obligations arising from legal or constructive commitment resulting from past events are expected to lead to an outflow of economic resources from the group which can be estimated reliably.
Provisions are measured at the present value of the estimated expenditure required to settle the present obligation, based on the most reliable evidence available at the balance sheet date.
All provisions are reviewed at each balance sheet date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimates.
Equity
Equity comprises the following:
· "Issued capital" represents the nominal value of equity shares.
· "Share premium" represents the excess over nominal value of the fair value of consideration received for equity shares, net of expenses of the share issue.
· "Merger reserve" represents the excess over nominal value of the fair value of shares issued in a share for share exchange satisfying the conditions of section 612 of the Companies Act 2006.
· "Capital redemption reserve" represents the nominal value of shares redeemed.
· "Share-based payment reserve" represents equity-settled share-based employee remuneration until such share options are exercised.
· "Other reserve" represents the equity component of the secured convertible loan notes which have both a debt and equity component.
· "Foreign exchange reserve" represents the differences arising from translation of investments in overseas subsidiaries.
· "Retained earnings" represents retained profits less retained losses.
· "Non-controlling interests" represents the amounts not attributable to the parent company.
Share-based payments
Equity-settled transactions
The group operates equity-settled share-based compensation plans for remuneration of its employees.
All employee services received in exchange for the grant of any share-based compensation are measured at their fair values. These are indirectly determined by reference to the share option awarded. Their value is appraised at the grant date and excludes the impact of any non-market vesting conditions (e.g. profitability or sales growth targets).
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted and is recognised as an expense over the vesting period, which ends on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award. Fair value is determined by an external valuer using an appropriate pricing model. In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any vesting conditions, other than market conditions linked to the price of the shares of the company.
At each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative expense is calculated, representing the extent to which the vesting period has expired and management's best estimate of the achievement or otherwise of non-market conditions and the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest; or in the case of an instrument subject to a market condition, be treated as vesting as described above. The movement in cumulative expense since the previous balance sheet date is recognised in profit or loss, with a corresponding entry in equity.
Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modified or a new award is designated as replacing a cancelled or settled award, the cost based on the original award terms continues to be recognised over the original vesting period. In addition, an expense is recognised over the remainder of the new vesting period for the incremental fair value of any modification, based on the difference between the fair value of the original award and the fair value of the modified award, both as measured on the date of the modification. No reduction is recognised if this difference is negative.
Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any cost not yet recognised in profit or loss for the award is expensed immediately. Any compensation paid up to the fair value of the award at the cancellation or settlement date is deducted from equity, with any excess over fair value being treated as an expense in profit or loss.
All equity-settled share-based payments are ultimately recognised as an expense in the statement of comprehensive income with a corresponding credit to "share-based payment reserve".
Upon exercise of share options, the proceeds received net of any directly attributable transaction costs, up to the nominal value of the shares issued, are reallocated to share capital with any excess being recorded as additional share premium.
Employee benefits
Defined contribution pension scheme
The pension costs charged against profits are the contributions payable to the scheme in respect of the accounting period.
The group pays contributions to personal pension schemes of employees, which are administered independently of the group.
4. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGMENTS AND KEY SOURCES OF ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY
In the application of the group's accounting policies, described in note 3, the directors are required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.
Critical judgments in applying the group's accounting policies
The following are the critical judgments, apart from those involving estimations (which are dealt with separately below), that the directors have made in the process of applying the group's accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in financial statements.
Going concern
The company expects to generate sufficient funds to operate as a going concern for the next 12 months, based on its current production levels and prevailing market conditions.
Weatherly has passed two significant milestones in the last six months. First, the business has achieved the successful recommissioning of its Central Operations (Otjihase and Matchless mines); and secondly, these operations have passed the significant 'maximum cash out point' in the recommissioning process and have become a financially independent and cash generative business.
Exchange rates and copper prices will continue to have significant impact over the ongoing economics of the projects. The investment decision over the recommissioning of its Central Operations was made with a financial model using the assumptions of a copper price of US$6,600/tonne and an exchange rate of US$1: N$7.6, with base case assumptions of US$5,500/tonne and US$1:N$8.5. If prevailing prices were to deteriorate significantly from these assumptions, the business would reconsider the continuation of the operations.
The business has taken steps to manage its exposure to the commodity markets. It has sold forward approximately 35% of forecast production of copper concentrate at an average price of US$9,565/ tonne of copper, which it is currently delivering into. The group maintains forward contracts extending out to between 15 and 18months. These forward sales were negotiated in an attempt to preserve the profitability of the mines in the face of an economic crisis similar in scale to that of 2008-2009.
The business has a debt financing facility of US$7 million with Louis Dreyfus. The loan is linked to an offtake agreement and is structured with repayment terms linked to the production of concentrate at the Central Operations. The board considers this financing model reduces risk by better matching its debt service obligations with projected cash flows.
Capitalisation and expensing development expenses
For a new start up, all pre-production expenditure and any associated income are capitalised until reaching commercial production. The group defines commercial production as 60% of budgeted steady state production. After reaching commercial production income and expenditure are charged to profit and loss. The capitalised development is amortised over the life of the mine.
The directors use their judgment to determine the level of production at which the mine will achieve a steady state and the life of a mine.
Where a mine recommences production after being in care and maintenance, all production costs and associated income are charged to profit and loss immediately. Specific development projects, for example to open up new areas of the mine, are capitalised within property, plant and equipment. These development projects are amortised over the period in which the mine will benefit from the development, as discussed below.
Carrying value of property, plant and equipment
All mining assets are amortised where the mine operating plan calls for production from well-defined mineral reserves over proven and probable reserves.
For mobile and fixed plant, the straight-line method is applied over the estimated useful life of the asset which does not exceed the estimated mine life based on proven and probable mineral reserves, as the useful lives of these assets are considered to be limited to the life of the relevant mine.
The calculation of amortisation could be impacted by the estimate of actual production in the future being different from current forecast production based on proven and probable mineral reserves. This would generally result to the extent that there are significant changes in any of the factors or assumptions used in estimating mineral reserves.
The factors affecting estimated mineral reserves include:
· changes in proven and probable mineral reserves;
· the grade of mineral reserves may vary significantly from time to time;
· differences between actual commodity prices and commodity price assumptions;
· unforeseen operational issues at mine sites;
· changes in capital, operating, mining, processing and reclamation costs, discount rates and foreign exchange rates; and
· changes in mineral reserves could similarly impact the useful lives of assets depreciated on a straight line basis, where those lives are limited to the life of the mine.
The recoverable amounts of cash-generating units and individual assets have been determined based on the higher of value-in-use calculations and fair values less costs to sell. These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions. It is possible that the copper price estimation may change, which may then impact the estimated life of mine determinant and may then require a material adjustment to the carrying value of property, plant and equipment.
The group reviews and tests the carrying value of assets when events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of cash flows of other assets. If there are indications that impairment may have occurred, estimates are prepared of expected future cash flows for each group of assets. They are significantly affected by a number of factors including published reserves, resources, exploration potential and production estimates, together with economic
factors such as spot and future copper prices, discount rates, foreign currency exchange rates, estimates of costs to produce reserves, and future capital expenditure.
Fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments
The directors use their judgment in selecting an appropriate valuation technique for financial instruments not quoted in an active market, and have selected the Black Scholes model. Valuation techniques commonly used by market practitioners are applied. For derivative financial instruments, assumptions are made based on quoted market rates adjusted for specific features of the instrument. Other financial instruments are valued using a discounted cash flow analysis based on assumptions supported, where possible, by observable market prices or rates. Details of the assumptions used and of the results of sensitivity analyses regarding these assumptions are provided in note 31.
5. REVENUE
An analysis of the group's revenue is as follows:
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Sale of goods | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | | 16 | | 145 |
Rendering of service | | | | | |
Discontinued operations (note 8) | | | - | | 25,451 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total revenue | | | 16 | | 25,596 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
6. OTHER OPERATING INCOME
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Property rental | | | 127 | | 219 |
Other | | | 57 | | 56 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 184 | | 275 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
7. OPERATING SEGMENTS
In identifying its operating segments, management generally follows the group's service lines, which represent the main products and services provided by the group.
The activities undertaken by the mining segment include the sale of extracted copper and exploration activities. The activities undertaken by the smelting segment included smelting concentrate from third parties on a toll basis.
Each of these operating segments is managed separately as each of these service lines requires different technologies and other resources as well as marketing approaches.
The smelting segment was discontinued from 24 March 2010 when the segment was disposed of.
The measurement policies the group uses for segment reporting under IFRS 8 are the same as those used in its financial statements.
During the year the group reopened its Central Operations mines, Otjihase and Matchless. These two mines are close together and share a common processing facility. Their revenues are indistinguishable and the two mines are viewed as one operating unit. Apart from these mines the only costs incurred within the mining sector were capitalised outsourced evaluation costs relating to feasibility studies for the Tschudi open pit mine and Tsumeb tailings projects. In total, US$414,000 (2010: nil) has been capitalised relating to these studies as disclosed in note 17. As there are no other revenues, costs, or assets or liabilities outside the Central Operations, only one operating unit has been disclosed within mining.
The group's operations are located in Namibia and the UK. The mining and smelting segments are located in Namibia, while the corporate function is carried out in London.
Year ended 30 June 2011 | | | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | Smelting | | Consolidated |
| | | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Sales and other operating revenues | | | | | | | |||
External sales | | | | 16 | | - | | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Segment revenues | | | | 16 | | - | | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | Smelting | | Consolidated |
Segmental loss | | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Segmental operating loss | | | (4,112) | | - | | (4,112) | ||
Discontinued business | | | (508) | | - | | (508) | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | (4,620) | | - | | (4,620) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Unallocated corporate expenses | | | | | | | 3,710 | ||
Interest expense | | | | | | | | (188) | |
Interest income | | | | | | | | 52 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss on continuing business | | | | | | | (1,046) | ||
Loss from discontinued business | | | | | | | (113) | ||
Profit from disposal of business | | | | | | | 621 | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss for period before tax | | | | | | | (538) | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | Smelting | | |
Segmental costs | | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | | |
Depreciation | | | | 3,709 | | - | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Revenue by geographical area | | | | | South Africa | | | ||
| | | | | | | US$'000 | | |
Total revenue | | | | | | 16 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 16 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
All the group's revenues were to a single customer. | | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | Smelting | | Total |
| | | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Segment assets | | | | 41,922 | | - | | 41,922 | |
Unallocated corporate assets | | | | | | | 7,945 | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | | | | | | 49,867 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | | | |
Non-current assets by geographic area | | US$'000 | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | |
Namibia | | | | | 33,290 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 30 June 2010 | | | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | Smelting | | Consolidated |
| | | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Sales and other operating revenues | | | | | | | |||
External sales | | | | 145 | | 25,451 | | 25,596 | |
Discontinued business | | | - | | (25,451) | | (25,451) | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Segment revenues | | | | 145 | | - | | 145 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | Smelting | | Consolidated |
Segmental loss | | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Segmental operating loss | | | (6,788) | | (8,744) | | (15,532) | ||
Discontinued business | | | 438 | | 8,744 | | 9,182 | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | (6,350) | | - | | (6,350) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Unallocated corporate expenses | | | | | | | (3,356) | ||
Interest expense | | | | | | | | (1,291) | |
Interest income | | | | | | | | 19 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss on continuing business | | | | | | | (10,978) | ||
Loss from discontinued business | | | | | | | (9,182) | ||
Profit from disposal of business | | | | | | | 29,229 | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Profit for period before tax | | | | | | | 9,069 | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | Smelting | | |
Segmental costs | | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | | |
Depreciation | | | | (3,470) | | (1,459) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Revenue by geographical area | | | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | US$'000 | | |
Total revenue | | | | | | 25,596 | | | |
Discontinued segment- Switzerland | | | | (25,451) | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
South Africa | | | | | | 145 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The group's revenues were to two customers. | | | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | Smelting | | Total |
| | | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Segment assets | | | | 27,497 | | - | | 27,497 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Unallocated corporate assets | | | | | | | 14,412 | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | | | | | | 41,909 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mining | | | | |
Non-current assets by geographic area | | US$'000 | | | | | |||
| | | | | | | | | |
Namibia | | | | | 22,806 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
8. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Revenue | | | - | | 25,451 |
Cost of sales | | | (117) | | (34,489) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Gross loss | | | (117) | | (9,038) |
| | | | | |
Other operating income | | | 4 | | 984 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Operating loss | | | (113) | | (8,054) |
| | | | | |
Foreign exchange loss | | | - | | - |
Finance costs | | | - | | (1,163) |
Finance income | | | - | | 35 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Loss on discontinued activities before income tax | | | (113) | | (9,182) |
| | | | | |
Income tax expense | | | - | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Loss on discontinued operations | | | (113) | | (9,182) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Profit from disposal of discontinued operations | | | 621 | | 29,229 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 508 | | 20,047 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
On 17 May 2010, the group sold the Kombat mine owned by Ongopolo Mining Ltd to Grove Export cc for N$22.8 million, approximately US$3.2 million. The mine was disclosed within the mining segment.
Proceeds | | | US$'000 | | |
Cash | | | 3,202 | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 3,202 | | |
Net asset value of assets disposed of | | | 2,581 | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Profit on disposal | | | 621 | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The fair value of assets disposed of was: | | | US$'000 | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 2,581 | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 2,581 | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
9. OPERATING LOSS
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
This is stated after charging/(crediting): | | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Depreciation of owned assets | | | 3,714 | | 3,486 |
Amortisation of owned assets | | | 3 | | 27 |
Staff costs in continuing business (note 11) | | | 3,314 | | 1,678 |
Settlement of Barclays claim | | | - | | 1,034 |
Share-based payment charge: non-staff costs | | | - | | 102 |
(Profit)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment | | | (660) | | 246 |
Operating lease payments: equipment | | | 3 | | - |
Auditor's remuneration (note 10) | | | 131 | | 130 |
| | | | | |
10. AUDITOR'S REMUNERATION
The remuneration of the auditor is further analysed as follows: | | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Fees payable to the company's auditor for the audit of the | | | | | |
company's annual accounts | | | 79 | | 75 |
Fees payable to the company's auditor and its associates | | | | | |
for other services: | | | | | |
The audit of the company's subsidiaries, pursuant | | | | | |
to legislation | | | 27 | | 20 |
Other services pursuant to legislation | | | 14 | | 8 |
Tax services | | | 11 | | 27 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total remuneration | | | 131 | | 130 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
11. EMPLOYEES AND KEY MANAGEMENT
The total directors' emoluments for the year were US$644,000 (2010: US$699,000) and those of the highest paid director were US$428,000 (2010: US$466,000). Detailed disclosure of directors' remuneration is disclosed in the audited sections of the directors' remuneration report.
a) Staff numbers
The average number of employees, including directors | | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
Group: | | | No. | | No. |
Corporate UK | | | 8 | | 7 |
Namibia | | | | | |
Mining | | | 22 | | 14 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Average number of persons employed- continuing operations | | | 30 | | 21 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Smelting | | | - | | 292 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Average number of persons employed - discontinued operations | | | - | | 292 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Average number of persons employed | | | 30 | | 313 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
b) Staff costs
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
Aggregated remuneration comprised: | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Wages and salaries | | | 2,973 | | 1,315 |
Social security costs | | | 82 | | 89 |
Pension contributions | | | 107 | | 89 |
Share-based payments | | | 152 | | 185 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Employment costs - continuing operations | | | 3,314 | | 1,678 |
Employment costs - discontinued operations | | | - | | 3,134 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 3,314 | | 4,812 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
c) Key management remuneration
Salaries and fees | | | 1,171 | | 703 |
Pension contributions | | | 91 | | 69 |
Key management share-based payments | | | 152 | | 185 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Continuing business | | | 1,414 | | 957 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Key management personnel as defined under IAS 24 have been identified as the board of directors and further management personnel who have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the group.
12. FINANCE INCOME
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Interest revenue: | | | | | |
Bank deposits | | | 52 | | 19 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total interest revenue- continuing operations | | | 52 | | 19 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Investment revenue earned on financial assets analysed by category of asset is as follows: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Loans & receivables (including cash and bank balances) | | | 52 | | 19 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
13. FINANCE COSTS
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Convertible loan note | | | - | | 1,218 |
Third-party loan | | | - | | 17 |
Bank | | | 46 | | - |
Other | | | 142 | | 56 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total interest expense- continuing operations | | | 188 | | 1,291 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
14. INCOME TAX EXPENSE
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Profit/(loss) before tax | | | (538) | | 9,069 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
UK corporation tax at 27.5% (2010: 28%) | | | (148) | | 2,539 |
Tax effects of: | | | | | |
Expenses not allowable for tax purposes | | | (214) | | 272 |
Capital profits not taxable | | | - | | (5,600) |
Impairment of asset | | | - | | - |
Other adjustment | | | - | | - |
Differences in local tax rates | | | - | | - |
Excess of capital allowances over depreciation | | | - | | 60 |
Tax losses utilised in period | | | - | | - |
Tax losses not for future utilisation | | | - | | - |
Tax losses for future utilisation | | | 362 | | 2,729 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total income tax expense | | | - | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Unrecognised deferred tax provision | | | | | |
Accelerated capital allowances | | | 8,970 | | 16,993 |
Other temporary differences | | | 1,649 | | - |
Share-based payments | | | (17) | | - |
Tax losses - UK | | | (2,524) | | (2,784) |
Tax losses - Namibia | | | (54,380) | | (49,743) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Unrecognised deferred tax asset | | | (46,302) | | (35,533) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The deferred tax assets are currently unrecognised as the likelihood of sufficient future taxable profits does not yet meet the definition of "probable".
The unrecognised deferred tax asset has no expiry period.
15. DIVIDENDS AND OTHER APPROPRIATIONS
A condition of the disposal of Namibian Custom Smelters Ltd was that Weatherly International plc would issue shares received in Dundee Precious Metals Inc to its shareholders. The shares were issued in two instalments of 883,924 shares each. At receipt the shares were valued at US$3.15 and at year end they were valued at US$4.37. At the time of the first distribution on 21 October 2010, the shares were valued at US$5.50 and at the time of the second distribution on 23 May 2011 they were valued at US$8.53. The dividend has been accounted for as follows:
| | | | | | US$000 |
Dividend declared on receipt | | | | 5,570 | ||
Revaluation to equity reserve | | | | 2,153 | ||
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Dividends in creditors at 30 June 2010 (note 25) | | 7,723 | ||||
Revaluation to equity reserve on initial distribution | 1,001 | | ||||
Revaluation to equity reserve on final distribution | 3,674 | | ||||
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Increase in valuation of dividend when paid | | | 4,675 | |||
Dividend paid | | | | | (12,398) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Dividends in creditors at 30 June 2011 (note 25) | | - | ||||
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
16. EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE
The calculation of basic and diluted loss per ordinary share is based on the following data:
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Basic (loss)/earnings per share (US cents) | | | | | |
Loss from continuing activities | | | (0.21c) | | (2.43c) |
Earnings from discontinued activities | | | 0.10c | | 4.53c |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total | | | (0.11c) | | 2.10c |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Diluted (loss)/earnings per share (US cents) | | | | | |
Loss from continuing activities | | | (0.21c) | | (2.43c) |
Earnings from discontinued activities | | | 0.10c | | 4.53c |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total | | | (0.11c) | | 2.10c |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares for basic earnings/(loss) per share | | | 507,547,250 | | 442,456,419 |
| | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares for diluted earnings/(loss) per share | | | 507,547,250 | | 442,456,419 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Both the basic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the loss attributable to shareholders of the parent company, Weatherly International plc, of US$535,000 (2010 profit of US$9,307,000) as the numerator, i.e. no adjustment to profit was necessary in either year.
For the year ended 30 June 2011, 26.8 million (2010: 26.6 million) potential ordinary shares have been excluded from the calculations of earnings / (loss) per share as they are anti-dilutive.
17. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
| | | | Evaluation | | Computer software | | Total |
| | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2009 | | | | - | | 94 | | 94 |
Exchange difference | | | | - | | 3 | | 3 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2010 | | | | - | | 97 | | 97 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Amortisation: | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2009 | | | | - | | (60) | | (60) |
Provided during the year | | | | - | | (33) | | (33) |
Exchange difference | | | | - | | (1) | | (1) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2010 | | | | - | | (94) | | (94) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net book value at 30 June 2010 | | | | - | | 3 | | 3 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2010 | | | | - | | 97 | | 97 |
Additions | | | | 410 | | - | | 410 |
Exchange difference | | | | 4 | | 9 | | 13 |
Disposals | | | | - | | (106) | | (106) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2011 | | | | 414 | | - | | 414 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Amortisation: | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2010 | | | | - | | (94) | | (94) |
Provided during the year | | | | - | | (3) | | (3) |
Exchange differences | | | | - | | (12) | | (12) |
Disposals | | | | - | | 109 | | 109 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2011 | | | | - | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net book value at 30 June 2011 | | | | 414 | | - | | 414 |
| | | | | | | | |
18. PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
a)
| | Freehold property | | Plant and machinery | | Assets under construction | | Development costs | | Totals |
| | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2009 | | 36,258 | | 31,889 | | 1,044 | | 40,395 | | 109,586 |
Additions | | - | | 32 | | 1,718 | | - | | 1,750 |
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale | | (1,985) | | (3,053) | | - | | - | | (5,038) |
Disposals | | (15,521) | | (12,193) | | (2,802) | | (40,395) | | (70,911) |
Exchange adjustment | | 1,299 | | 2,195 | | 40 | | - | | 3,534 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2010 | | 20,051 | | 18,870 | | - | | - | | 38,921 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation: | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2009 | | (5,401) | | (12,266) | | - | | (40,395) | | (58,062) |
Provided during the year | | (1,983) | | (2,962) | | - | | - | | (4,945) |
Transfer to non-current assets held for sale | | 500 | | 2,689 | | - | | - | | 3,189 |
Disposals | | 2,303 | | 2,790 | | - | | 40,395 | | 45,488 |
Exchange adjustment | | (310) | | (1,478) | | - | | - | | (1,788) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2010 | | (4,891) | | (11,227) | | - | | - | | (16,118) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net book value at 30 June 2010 | | 15,160 | | 7,643 | | - | | - | | 22,803 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2010 | | 20,051 | | 18,870 | | - | | - | | 38,921 |
Additions | | - | | 4,593 | | - | | 4,701 | | 9,294 |
Reverse impairment (note 35) | | - | | - | | - | | 2,240 | | 2,240 |
Disposals | | (323) | | (44) | | - | | - | | (367) |
Exchange adjustment | | 2,405 | | 4,459 | | - | | - | | 6,864 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2011 | | 22,133 | | 27,878 | | - | | 6,941 | | 56,952 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation: | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2010 | | (4,891) | | (11,227) | | - | | - | | (16,118) |
Provided during the year | | (1,163) | | (2,551) | | - | | - | | (3,714) |
Disposals | | 23 | | 44 | | - | | - | | 67 |
Exchange adjustment | | (904) | | (3,464) | | - | | - | | (4,368) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2011 | | (6,935) | | (17,198) | | - | | - | | (24,133) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net book value at 30 June 2011 | | 15,198 | | 10,680 | | - | | 6,941 | | 32,819 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
The following serve as security for borrowings as follows:
| | Carrying amount | | Carrying amount | | Bond amount | | Bond amount |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Nature of property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Moveable mining assets of Ongopolo Mining Limited | | 6,386 | | 4,322 | | 12,000 | | 7,151 |
| | | | | | | | |
19. INVESTMENTS
a) Subsidiaries
The company's investments at the balance sheet date in the share capital of companies include the following:
Name | % Holding | Nature of business | Country of incorporation | Class of shares |
| | | | |
Weatherly (SL) Limited | 100 | Holding company | St Lucia | 1,000 ordinary US$1 |
WM Exploration Limited | 100 | Dormant | England and Wales | 200 ordinary 1p |
Puku Minerals Limited (owned by Weatherly (SL) Limited) | 100 | Mineral exploration | Zambia | 100 ordinary US$1 |
Weatherly (Namibia SL) Limited | 100 | Holding company | St Lucia | 125,381,946 ordinary 20p |
Weatherly (Namibian Custom Smelters) Limited | 100 | Holding company | St Lucia | 1,000 ordinary £1 |
Weatherly Management Services Limited | 100 | Management services | England and Wales | 1 ordinary £1 |
Weatherly Mining Namibia Limited owned by Weatherly (Namibia SL) Limited | 97 | Mineral exploration, development and production | Namibia | 20,000,000 ordinary N$1 1,000 redeemable preference shares N$1 |
Weatherly International Trustee Company Limited | 100 | Trustee company | England and Wales | 1 ordinary £1 |
| | | | |
China Africa Resources Namibia (Pty) Ltd | 100 | Holding company | Namibia | 100 N$1 shares |
| | | | |
The following entities are 100% owned by Weatherly Mining Namibia Limited: | | |||
Ongopolo Mining Limited | | Mineral exploration and development | Namibia | 95,590,000 ordinary N$0.387 |
Tsumeb Specimen Mining (Pty) Limited | Dormant | Namibia | 4,000 ordinary US$1 | |
Weatherly Central Operations (Pty) Limited | Mining and production | Namibia | 100 ordinary US$1 |
b) Investment in associates
During the year Weatherly International plc and East China Minerals Exploration and Development Bureau for Non-Ferrous Metals (ECE) set up a new company called China Africa Resources plc. Weatherly invested US$57,488 in a 35% holding of the share capital of China Africa Resources plc, and no further transactions occurred before 30 June 2011. For further information, see note 34.
Summary of the financial position of associates are as follows:
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Receivables | | | 248 | | - |
Cash | | | 61 | | - |
Payables | | | (149) | | - |
| | | 160 | | - |
| | | | | |
Equity | | | 160 | | - |
| | | | | |
c) Current investments
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Current investments | | | | | |
Investments in Dundee Precious Metals Inc ("DPM") | | | | | |
1,767,849 ordinary shares | | | | | |
Valuation at beginning of the year | | | 7,724 | | |
Valuation at receipt | | | - | | 5,570 |
Increase in valuation at disposal/during the year | | | 4,675 | | 2,154 |
Valuation at disposal | | | (12,399) | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
At 30 June | | | - | | 7,724 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
As part of the sale agreement of the smelter business it was agreed that the DPM shares, received as part of the consideration, would be distributed to Weatherly International plc shareholders in two equal distributions on 21 October 2010 and 23 May 2011 (see note 15).
The increase in value of the shares during 2010 was credited to equity reserve as was the increase in value up to the point of disposal during 2011. The total increase in value was then recycled through the profit and loss in line with IAS 39.
20. NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
Assets classified as non-current assets held for sale at June 2011 comprise properties sold at auction on 8 June 2009 and subject only to regulatory approval. All assets are included in the mining segment of the segmental analysis.
| | | | Freehold property | | Plant and machinery | | Total |
| | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at 30 June 2009 | | | | 2,368 | | - | | 2,368 |
Transferred from property, plant and equipment | | | | 1,485 | | 364 | | 1,849 |
Disposals | | | | (509) | | - | | (509) |
Exchange differences | | | | 59 | | (3) | | 56 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at 30 June 2010 | | | | 3,403 | | 361 | | 3,764 |
| | | | | | | | |
Disposals | | | | (2,615) | | (405) | | (3,020) |
Exchange differences | | | | 409 | | 44 | | 453 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at 30 June 2011 | | | | 1,197 | | 0 | | 1,197 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The carrying value above approximates to the selling value and costs to sell are expected to be minimal.
21. INVENTORIES
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Metal in concentrate on hand | | | 2,684 | | 52 |
Metal in ore stockpile on hand | | | 390 | | - |
Consumables | | | 293 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 3,367 | | 52 |
| | | | | |
The difference between purchase price or production cost of inventories and their replacement cost is not material.
22. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
| | | 30 June 2011 | |
30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Trade receivables | | | 1,564 | | 328 |
Prepayments and other receivables | | | 1,301 | | 104 |
VAT | | | 57 | | 147 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 2,922 | | 579 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
As at 30 June 2011 there were no trade receivables past due (2010: nil).
23. CASH
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Cash and short-term deposits | | | 7,751 | | 6,984 |
Pledged notice deposit | | | 1,340 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 9,091 | | 6,984 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
For the purpose of the cash flow statement the closing cash and cash equivalents comprise the following:
| | | | | |
| | | 7,751 | | 6,984 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The notice deposit is pledged in favour of the Namibian electricity supplier, Nampower, as a guarantee of payment.
24. BORROWINGS
Secured borrowings
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Secured borrowing at amortised cost | | | | | |
Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse SA (see below for details) | | | 7,000 | | - |
Short-term portion of loan | | | (1,715) | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 5,285 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse SA (see below for details) | | | 3,516 | | - |
Short-term portion of loan | | | (3,516) | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | - | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
First National Bank of Namibia Limited (see below for details) | | | 1,152 | | - |
Short-term portion of loan | | | (317) | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 835 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total borrowings | | | 11,668 | | - |
Short-term portion | | | (5,548) | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 6,120 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The weighted average interest rates paid during the year were as follows:
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | % | | % |
| | | | | |
Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse SA | | | 3.30% | | - |
Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse SA | | | 3.75% | | |
First National Bank of Namibia Limited | | | 9.75% | | - |
| | | | | |
Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse SA
The loan bears interest at US$ 3 month libor + 3% and is denominated in US$.
The loan is repayable at $50 per dry metric tonne sold to Louis Dreyfus by Ongopolo Mining Ltd (OML). In addition there is a cash sweep whereby Louis Dreyfus recovers 80% of the excess cash of OML.
US$2 million of the loan matures in March 2013 and the remaining US$5 million matures in November 2014.
The loan is secured by a notarial general covering bond up to US$12 million over the movable assets and debtors of OML and a pledge and cession of the shares of OML.
Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse SA
The loan bears interest at Louis Dreyfus's cost of funds + 2.5% for 60 days and is denominated in US$.
The loan is repayable on sale of copper concentrate stocks at Walvis Bay to Louis Dreyfus.
The loan is secured on the copper concentrate inventory at Walvis Bay.
First National Bank of Namibia Limited
The loan is an asset financing facility and bears interest at First National Bank of Namibia Limited's prime overdraft rate and is denominated in Namibian dollars.
The loan is repayable in 36 equal instalments.
The loan is secured on the assets financed by the facility and a letter of surety by Weatherly International plc.
25. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES - CURRENT
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Trade payables | | | 3,967 | | 2,688 |
Dividends (note 15) | | | - | | 7,723 |
Other payables and accruals | | | 397 | | 163 |
| | | | | |
| | | 4,364 | | 10,574 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Unsecured payables subject to a compromise on acquisition 1 | | | 3,223 | | 3,118 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
1 As part of the acquisition of Ongopolo, the group reached an offer of compromise with unsecured payables to repay the amounts due over five years, without interest accruing. An offer of compromise is broadly similar in effect to a scheme of arrangement with creditors under the Companies Act 2006. The offer of compromise was sanctioned by the High Court of Namibia.
26. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES - NON-CURRENT
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Unsecured payables subject to a compromise on acquisition 1 | | | 1,964 | | 1,900 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
1 Per explanation in note 25
27. PROVISIONS
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Opening provisions | | | 262 | | - |
Exchange movement | | | 31 | | - |
Provision for legal dispute | | | - | | 262 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Closing provisions | | | 293 | | 262 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
One of the group's subsidiaries is engaged in a legal dispute with a former contractor. The company provided for the amount it believes is payable under the contract. The contractor is claiming US$588,000.
28. AUTHORISED AND ISSUED SHARE CAPITAL
| | | | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | | | £ | | £ |
Authorised | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
652,331,400 ordinary shares of 0.5p (2010: 652,331,500 ordinary shares of 0.5p) | | | | | 3,261,657 | | 3,261,657 |
240,750,000 deferred ordinary shares of 0.099p | | | | | 238,343 | | 238,343 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | 3,500,000 | | 3,500,000 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The authorised capital is shown in sterling only and not in US dollars. | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Number of shares issued | | | | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | | | | | |
Number of shares in issue at beginning of the year | | | | | 445,893,427 | | 405,425,477 |
Shares issued during the year | | | | | 90,678,381 | | 40,467,950 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Number of shares in issue at end of the year | | | | | 536,571,808 | | 445,893,427 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Allotted, called up and fully paid | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| US$ | | US$ | | £ | | £ |
Ordinary shares of 0.5p | 4,580,867 | | 3,859,619 | | 2,682,859 | | 2,229,467 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| 4,580,867 | | 3,859,619 | | 2,682,859 | | 2,229,467 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The company issued the following shares and recorded the following movements in share capital (both in US dollars and sterling):
| | US$ | | US$ | | US$ | | £ | | £ | | £ |
| | Share capital | | Share premium | | Consideration | | Share capital | | Share premium | | Consideration |
15/07/2010 | Share options exercised | 1,168 | | 5,841 | | 7,009 | | 778 | | 3,887 | | 4,665 |
23/10/2010 | Equity raising | 707,954 | | 6,243,903 | | 6,951,857 | | 445,114 | | 4,006,030 | | 4,451,144 |
23/10/2010 | Expenses of equity raising | | | (339,372) | | (339,372) | | | | (213,375) | | (213,375) |
21/02/2011 | Share options exercised | 12,126 | | 181,890 | | 194,016 | | 7,500 | | 112,500 | | 120,000 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | 721,248 | | 6,092,262 | | 6,813,510 | | 453,392 | | 3,909,042 | | 4,362,434 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The outstanding warrants/options to subscribe for ordinary shares of the company as at 30 June 2011 are as follows:
| Number of warrants/options | | |
Date | Price per warrant/option | Expiry date | |
of grant | Pence | | |
10/05/2007 | 166,667 | 23.50 | 17/04/2013 |
10/05/2007 | 166,667 | 23.50 | 17/04/2014 |
10/05/2007 | 166,666 | 23.50 | 17/04/2015 |
08/05/2008 | 25,000 | 20.50 | 21/04/2012 |
08/05/2008 | 25,000 | 20.50 | 21/04/2013 |
10/05/2008 | 10,500,000 | 8.00 | 31/12/2013 |
01/04/2010 | 7,250,000 | 3.00 | 01/04/2020 |
05/08/2010 | 3,500,000 | 3.20 | 05/08/2020 |
16/03/2010 | 4,000,000 | 10.00 | 16/03/2020 |
26/05/2010 | 1,000,000 | 9.25 | 26/03/2020 |
29. NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS
| | | | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
At 30 June 2009 | | | | | - |
| | | | | |
Share of Weatherly Mining Namibia Ltd loss | | | | | (238) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
At 30 June 2010 | | | | | (238) |
| | | | | |
Share of Weatherly Mining Namibia Ltd loss | | | | | (3) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
At 30 June 2011 | | | | | (241) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Non-controlling interests represents 1% of Weatherly Mining Namibia.
30. CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Capital commitments | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Contracted for but not yet recognised in the financial statements | | | 293 | | 1,104 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
31. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
Equity-settled share-based payments: options/warrants
The company has an unapproved share option scheme for eligible employees, including directors. Options/warrants are exercisable at a price equal to the average market price of the company's shares on the date of grant, with a vesting period of three years. The options are settled in equity when exercised.
If the options remain unexercised after a period of 10 years from the vesting date, the options expire. Options are forfeited if the employee leaves the company before the options vest.
Details of the number of share options/warrants and the weighted average exercise price (WAEP) outstanding during the year are as follows:
Warrants
| At 30 June 2011 | | At 30 June 2010 | ||||
| | | Weighted average exercise price | | | | Weighted average exercise price |
| Warrants | | pence | | Warrants | | pence |
| | | | | | | |
Outstanding at start of the year | 5,618,970 | | 7.89 | | 8,810,220 | | 12.30 |
Granted during the year | - | | | | - | | |
Exercised during the year | (155,501) | | 3.00 | | - | | |
Lapsed during the year | (5,463,469) | | 8.03 | | (3,191,250) | | 20.13 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Outstanding at end of the year | - | | - | | 5,618,970 | | 7.89 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Exercisable at end of the year | - | | - | | 5,618,970 | | 7.89 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The weighted average share price at the date of exercise was 9.3p.
Options
| At 30 June 2011 | | At 30 June 2010 | ||||
| Options | | Weighted average exercise price | | Options | | Weighted average exercise price |
| | | pence | | | | pence |
Outstanding at start of period | 7,958,334 | | 4.74 | | 975,000 | | 22.50 |
Granted during the year | 8,500,000 | | 7.08 | | 7,250,000 | | 3 |
Forfeited/lapsed during the year | (158,334) | | 20.29 | | (266,666) | | 20.25 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Outstanding at end of the period | 16,300,000 | | 5.81 | | 7,958,334 | | 4.74 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Exercisable at end of the period | 2,966,667 | | 6.75 | | 500,000 | | 23.50 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Share options outstanding at the end of the year are exercisable within a range of 3p and 23p.
The average life remaining of options over shares is 9.43 years at 30 June 2011 (2010: 10.97)
The fair value of the options was calculated using the Black Scholes model. The inputs for the current year were as follows:
Date of grant | Estimated fair value | Share price | Exercise price | Expected volatility | Expected life | Risk-free rate |
| pence | pence | pence | | | |
26/05/2012 | 2.34 | 9.00 | 9.25 | 67.8200% | 10 | 1.6100% |
26/05/2012 | 3.33 | 9.00 | 9.25 | 67.8200% | 10 | 1.6100% |
26/05/2012 | 4.02 | 9.00 | 9.25 | 67.8200% | 10 | 1.6100% |
The dividend yield rate input in each of the above calculations was zero.
The share price movements during the year were as follows: high of 15.0p, low of 2.6p and a closing share price at 30 June 2011 of 9.5p.
The volatility of the company's share price on each date of grant was calculated as the average of volatilities of share prices of companies in the peer group on the corresponding dates. The share price volatility of each company in the peer group was calculated as the average of annualised standard deviations of daily continuously compounded returns on the companies' stock, calculated over five years back from the date of grant.
The peer group consists of mining companies quoted on AIM with a market capitalisation of less than £100 million. The risk-free rate is the yield to maturity on the date of grant of a UK Gilt Strip, with term to maturity equal to the life of the option.
Equity-settled share-based payments: LTIP shares
The company has a long-term incentive plan (LTIP) which is a share incentive arrangement introduced for eligible employees including directors. A grant will be awarded over a fixed number of shares and will be subject to a three-year holding period and performance requirements by the company. Options issued for shares under the LTIP have no exercise price.
With the exceptions of leaving the company or a change of control, awards may be exercised at any point from the date of the release at the end of the three-year holding period until the tenth anniversary of the date of grant, when the award will lapse.
The volatility of the company's share price on each date of grant was calculated as the average of volatilities of share prices of companies in the peer group on the corresponding dates. The share price volatility of each company in the peer group was calculated as the average of annualised standard deviations of daily continuously compounded returns on the companies' stock, calculated over five years back from the date of grant.
The peer group consists of mining companies quoted on AIM with a market capitalisation of less than £100 million. The risk-free rate is the yield to maturity on the date of grant of a UK Gilt Strip, with term to maturity equal to the life of the option.
| | | Year ended | | Year ended |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | | | |
| | | No. shares | | No. shares |
| | | | | |
Outstanding at beginning of year | | | 2,537,666 | | 2,669,244 |
Expired during the year | | | (2,537,666) | | (131,578) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Outstanding at end of the period | | | - | | 2,537,666 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Exercisable at end of the period | | | - | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The share price movements during the year were as follows: high of 15 pence, low of 2.6 pence and a closing share price at 30 June 2011 of 9.5 pence.
The company recognised total expenses of US$152,000 (2010: US$314,000) related to equity-settled share-based payment transactions during the year of which US$nil (2010: US$102,000) was not staff related.
32. PENSIONS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The parent company has no pension scheme or post-retirement benefits scheme. Payments are made to the private pension funds of directors, forming part of their total remuneration.
Ongopolo Mining Ltd contributes 8% of pensionable salaries, while employees are obliged to contribute 1% of pensionable salaries and may contribute more if they wish. The fund is administered on an inclusive basis, meaning the difference between the total contribution of 8% and the total income of the fund accumulates for the retirement fund purposes.
33. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Significant accounting policies
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument, are disclosed in note 3.
Categories of financial instruments
The carrying amounts presented in the statement of financial position relate to the following categories of assets and liabilities
| | | | | | | Carrying value | ||
| | | | | | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | | | | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Financial assets | | | | | | | | | |
Current | | | | | | | | | |
Loans and receivables | | | | | | | | | |
Trade and other receivables | | | | | | | 1,569 | | 328 |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | 9,091 | | 6,984 |
Available for sale financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | | | | | | | - | | 7,724 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 10,660 | | 15,036 |
Financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | |
Current | | | | | | | | | |
Amortised cost | | | | | | | 13,135 | | 13,692 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current | | | | | | | | | |
Amortised cost | | | | | | | 8,084 | | 1,900 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 21,219 | | 15,592 |
| | | | | | | | | |
As at 30 June 2011 there were no trade receivables that were past due and all are believed to be recoverable.
The fair value is equivalent to book value for current assets and liabilities. Non-current liabilities are discounted at prevailing interest rates for both the long and short term elements.
The table below summarises the maturity profile of the group's financial liabilities at 30 June 2010, based on contractual undiscounted payments.
Year ended 30 June 2010 | | | | | | | |
| | | Within | | | | More than |
| | | 1 year | | 1-5 years | | 5 years |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Floating rate | | | | | | | |
Unsecured creditors subject to a compromise on acquisition | | | 3,174 | | 2,293 | | - |
| | | | | | | |
Non-interest bearing | | | | | | | |
Trade and other payables | | | 10,574 | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Year ended 30 June 2011 | | | | | | | |
| | | Within | | | | More than |
| | | 1 year | | 1-5 years | | 5 years |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Floating rate | | | | | | | |
Loans | | | 5,658 | | 6,555 | | |
Unsecured creditors subject to a compromise on acquisition | | | 3,556 | | 2,569 | | - |
| | | | | | | |
Non-interest bearing | | | | | | | |
Trade and other payables | | | 4,364 | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Liquidity risk
The directors monitor cash flow on a daily basis and at monthly board meetings in the context of their expectations for the business, in order to ensure sufficient liquidity is available to meet foreseeable needs. At present, equity funding from share issues and loans from Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse SA are the main methods of funding.
Interest rate risk
The group's policy is to minimise interest rate cash flow risk exposures on long-term financing. At 30 June 2011, the company was exposed to changes in market interest rates through its parent company and bank borrowings, which are subject to variable interest rates.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the net results for the year and equity to a reasonably possible change in interest rates of +/- 1.0 basis points (2010: +/- 1.0 basis points) with effect from the beginning of the year. These changes are considered to be reasonably possible based on observation of current market conditions. The calculations are based on the company's financial instruments held at each balance sheet date. All other variables are held constant.
| | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
| | | +1.0 | | +1.0 |
| | | Base points | | Base points |
| | | | | |
Net effect on after-tax profits | | | 116,681 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Equity | | | 116,681 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
An increase in interest rates will decrease profits.
Substantially all cash resources are invested in fixed-rate interest-bearing deposits - sterling at 0.53% on monthly call and US dollars at 0.16% on monthly call. The directors seek to get the best rates possible while maintaining flexibility and accessibility. The inter-company loans are set at a rate tied to the market from time to time.
Credit risk
The group sells copper concentrate to a recognised, creditworthy trading house. The income is paid for with terms of 95% on the concentrate leaving Namibia, with 5% being trade receivables. The maximum credit risk exposure related to financial assets is represented by the carrying value as at the balance sheet date.
Foreign currency risk management
The group undertakes certain transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Exchange rate exposures are managed within approved policy parameters utilising spot rate foreign exchange contracts. The group operates within the UK and southern Africa and most revenue transactions are denominated in US dollars while most costs are denominated in Namibian dollars, resulting in exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. Funds are periodically transferred overseas to meet capital commitments as required.
The carrying amounts of the group's foreign currency denominated monetary assets (cash, trade and other receivables) and monetary liabilities at the reporting date are as follows:
| | | Liabilities | | Assets | ||||
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | | |
United States dollar | | | 11,668 | | - | | 2,636 | | 5,641 |
British pound | | | - | | - | | 4,085 | | 790 |
Namibian dollar | | | - | | - | | 3,934 | | 881 |
Australian dollar | | | - | | - | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL | | | 11,668 | | - | | 10,655 | | 7,312 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency sensitivity analysis
The group is mainly exposed to the currencies of the United Kingdom (British pound) and Namibia (Namibian dollar).
The following table details the group's sensitivity to a 10% increase and decrease in the US dollar against the relevant foreign currencies. 10% is the sensitivity rate used when reporting foreign currency risk internally to key management personnel and represents management's assessment of the reasonably possible change in foreign exchange rates. The sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding foreign currency denominated monetary items and adjusts their translation at the period end for a 10% change in foreign currency rates. The sensitivity analysis includes external loans as well as loans to foreign operations within the group where the denomination of the loan is in a currency other than the currency of the lender or the borrower. A positive number below indicates an increase in profit and equity where the US dollar strengthens 10% against the relevant currency. For a 10% weakening of the US dollar against the relevant currency, there would be an equal and opposite impact on the profit and equity, and the balances below would be negative.
| | | British pound currency impact | | Namibian dollar currency impact | ||||
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Effect on profit | | +10% | (409) | | (79) | | (393) | | (88) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | -10% | 409 | | 79 | | 393 | | 88 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Effect on equity | | +10% | (409) | | (79) | | (393) | | (88) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | -10% | 409 | | 79 | | 393 | | 88 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the statement of financial position in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. This hierarchy groups financial assets and liabilities into three levels based on the significance of inputs used in measuring the fair value of the financial assets and liabilities. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
· Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
· Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liabilitiy, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and
· Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
The level within which the financial asset or liability is classified is determined based on the lowest level of significant input to the fair value measurement.
The financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the statement of financial position are grouped into the fair value hierarchy as follows:
2010 | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
| | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | | US$'000 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Listed securities | | - | | 7,724 | | - | | 7,724 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net fair value | | | 7,724 | | | | 7,724 | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
There have been no significant transfers between levels 1 and 2 in the reporting period.
The methods and valuation techniques used for the purpose of measuring fair value are unchanged compared to the previous reporting period.
All listed equity securities held in 2010 were publicly traded in Canada. (see note 19c)
There were no fair value assets or liabilities in 2011.
34. EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO BALANCE SHEET DATE
China Africa Resources plc
On 1 August 2011, Weatherly's associated company, China Africa Resources plc (CAR) listed on AIM. This completed the conditions precedent where by East China Minerals Exploration and Development Bureau for Non-Ferrous Metals (ECE) paid £4.7 million (approximately US$7.7 million) to maintain their 65% share of CAR and Weatherly sold their subsidiary, China Africa Resources Namibia (pty) Ltd (CARN), which owned the Berg Aukas mine in Namibia, to CAR to maintain their 35% shareholding. CARN was valued at $1 at the time of the transfer. Immediately after the listing, Weatherly issued 10% of the shares as an 'in specie' dividend to its shareholders, leaving the company with 25% of the share capital of CAR.
Sale of Ongopolo Mining Ltd shares
On 27 September 2011, Weatherly announced that its subsidiary, Weatherly Mining Namibia Ltd, had sold a 2.5 per cent shareholding in its Namibian subsidiary Ongopolo Mining Limited (OML) to Labour Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LIH), the investment arm of the National Union of Namibian Workers.
The sale price for the shares was N$7.2 million (approximately US$1 million) and will be provided for through a vendor financing agreement whereby OML will lend LIH the consideration for the shares, and the repayments including interest will be deducted from LIH's future dividends. Under the agreement, LIH also has a five year option to increase its shareholding to 5 per cent. Payment for the second 2.5 per cent tranche would be in cash, with the price based on an independent valuation of OML at the time of exercise.
35. IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
Summary of reversal of impairments for the year ended | | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Otjihase | | | 2,240 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Otjihase development expenditure was impaired in 2008 when the mines were put on care and maintenance. With the reopening of the mines, the impairment has been reassessed and the development expenditure reinstated.
The impairment has been reversed to cost of sales in comprehensive income within the mining segment.
36. OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions between the company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note.
There are no other related party transactions.
37. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The group's capital management objectives are:
· to ensure the group's ability to continue as a going concern; and
· to provide an adequate return to shareholders
by pricing products and services commensurately with the level of risk.
The group sets the amount of capital in proportion to its overall financing structure, i.e. equity and financial liabilities. The group manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to it in the light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares, or sell assets to reduce debt.
Capital for the reporting periods under review is summarised as follows:
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Total equity | | | 28,596 | | 26,293 |
Borrowings | | | 11,668 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 40,264 | | 26,293 |
| | | | | |
The company's going concern status is covered in note 4, and the activities of the company to provide adequate return to shareholders are described in the Chairman's and Chief Executive statement and the review of operations.
Statement of directors' responsibilities - company
The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable laws). Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
· select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently
· make judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent
· state whether applicable UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and
· prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
In so far as each of the directors is aware:
· there is no relevant audit information of which the company's auditors are unaware; and
· the directors have taken all steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the company's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
We have audited the parent company financial statements of Weatherly International plc for the year ended 30 June 2011 which comprise the parent company balance sheet, and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors
As explained more fully in the Directors' Responsibilities Statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the parent company financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the parent company financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's (APB's) Ethical Standards for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
A description of the scope of an audit of financial statements is provided on the APB's website at www.frc.org.uk/apb/scope/private.cfm.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the parent company financial statements:
· give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 30 June 2011;
· have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
· have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Opinion on other matter prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion the information given in the Directors' Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the parent company financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
· adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
· the parent company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
· certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or
· we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Other matter
We have reported separately on the group financial statements of Weatherly International plc for the year ended 30 June 2011.
Nicholas Page
Senior Statutory Auditor
for and on behalf of Grant Thornton UK LLP
Statutory Auditor, Chartered Accountants
Gatwick
11 October 2011
At 30 June 2011
| | | As at | | As at |
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Fixed assets | Note | | | | |
Tangible fixed assets | | | - | | 6 |
Investments | 40 | | 36,152 | | 36,095 |
| | | | | |
Total fixed assets | | | 36,152 | | 36,101 |
| | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | |
Investments | 40 | | - | | 7,724 |
Debtors- amounts due greater than 1 year | 43 | | 54,233 | | 46,043 |
Debtors- amounts due less than 1 year | 43 | | 494 | | 261 |
Cash at bank and in hand | | | 7,367 | | 6,399 |
| | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 62,094 | | 60,427 |
| | | | | |
Creditors | | | | | |
Amounts falling due within one year | 44 | | 4,233 | | 8,773 |
| | | | | |
| | | 4,233 | | 8,773 |
| | | | | |
Net current assets | | | 57,861 | | 51,654 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net assets | | | 94,013 | | 87,755 |
| | | | | |
Capital and reserves | | | | | |
Called up share capital | 49 | | 4,581 | | 3,860 |
Share premium | 49 | | 6,092 | | - |
Merger reserve | 49 | | 18,471 | | 18,471 |
Share- based payments reserve | 49 | | 302 | | 556 |
Profit and loss account | 49 | | 64,567 | | 64,868 |
| | | | | |
| | | 94,013 | | 87,755 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
On behalf of the board:
R J Webster
Chief Executive Officer
Approved by the board on 11 October 2011
Company registration no. 3954224
The notes form part of these financial statements.
For the year ended 30 June 2011
38. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
The separate financial statements of the company are presented as required by the Companies Act 2006. They have been prepared under the historical cost convention and in accordance with applicable United Kingdom Accounting Standards and law.
The principal accounting policies are summarised below and are consistent in all material respects with those applied in the previous year, except as otherwise noted.
39. ACCOUNTING POLICIES: PARENT ENTITY
a. Basis of preparation and change in accounting policy
The parent entity financial statements of Weatherly International plc were approved for issue by the board of directors on 11 October 2011.
The financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention apart from investments.
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards.
b. Tangible fixed assets
Tangible fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Such cost includes costs directly attributable to making the asset capable of operating as intended. Depreciation is provided on all tangible fixed assets, at rates calculated to write off the cost, less estimated residual value, based on prices prevailing at the date of acquisition, spread evenly over the expected useful life of each asset as follows:
Plant and machinery 3 to 15 years
The carrying values of tangible fixed assets are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
c. Depreciation and amortisation
Where the carrying amount of an asset is greater than its estimated recoverable amount, it is written down immediately to its recoverable amount (i.e. impairment losses are recognised).
d. Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of all timing differences that have originated but not reversed at the balance sheet date where transactions or events have occurred at that date that will result in an obligation to pay more, or a right to pay less or to receive more, tax, with the following exceptions:
· provision is made for tax on gains arising from the revaluation (and similar fair value adjustments) of fixed assets, and gains on disposal of fixed assets that have been rolled over into replacement assets, only to the extent that, at the balance sheet date, there is a binding agreement to dispose of the assets concerned. However, no provision is made where, on the basis of all available evidence at the balance sheet date, it is more likely than not that the taxable gain will be rolled over into replacement assets and charged to tax only where the replacement assets are sold;
· provision is made for deferred tax that would arise on remittance of the retained earnings of overseas subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures only to the extent that, at the balance sheet date, dividends have been accrued as receivable;
· deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that the directors consider that it is more likely than not that there will be suitable taxable profits from which the future reversal of the underlying timing differences can be deducted.
Deferred tax is measured on an undiscounted basis at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods in which timing differences reverse, based on tax rates and laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
e. Share-based payments
Equity-settled transactions
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted and is recognised as an expense over the vesting period, which ends on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award. Fair value is determined by an external valuer using an appropriate pricing model. In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any vesting conditions, other than market conditions linked to the price of the shares of the company.
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition, which are treated as vesting irrespective of whether or not the market condition is satisfied, provided that all other performance conditions are satisfied.
At each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative expense is calculated, representing the extent to which the vesting period has expired and management's best estimate of the achievement or otherwise of non-market conditions and the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest; or in the case of an instrument subject to a market condition, be treated as vesting as described above. The movement in cumulative expense since the previous balance sheet date is recognised in the profit and loss amount, with a corresponding entry in equity.
Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modified or a new award is designated as replacing a cancelled or settled award, the cost based on the original award terms continues to be recognised over the original vesting period. In addition, an expense is recognised over the remainder of the new vesting period for the incremental fair value of any modification, based on the difference between the fair value of the original award and the fair value of the modified award, both as measured on the date of the modification. No reduction is recognised if this difference is negative.
Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any cost not yet recognised in the profit and loss for the award is expensed immediately. Any compensation paid up to the fair value of the award at the cancellation or settlement date is deducted from equity, with any excess over fair value being treated as an expense in the profit and loss account.
All equity-settled share-based payments are ultimately recognised as an expense in the profit and loss account with a corresponding credit to "other reserve".
Upon exercise of share options, the proceeds received net of attributable transaction costs are credited to share capital and, where appropriate, share premium.
f. Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
All interest-bearing loans and borrowings are initially recognised at net proceeds. After initial recognition, debt is increased by the finance cost in respect of the reporting period and reduced by payments made in respect of the debts of the period. Finance costs of debt are allocated over the term of the debt at a constant rate on the carrying amount.
g. Classification of shares as debt or equity
An equity instrument is a contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all its liabilities. Accordingly, a financial instrument is treated as equity if:
(i) there is no contractual obligation to deliver cash or other financial assets or to exchange financial assets or liabilities on terms that may be unfavourable; and
(ii) the instrument is a non-derivative that contains no contractual obligations to deliver a variable number of shares or is a derivative that will be settled only by the group exchanging a fixed amount of cash or other assets for a fixed number of the group's own equity instruments.
When shares are issued, any component that creates a financial liability of the company or group is presented as a liability in the balance sheet, measured initially at fair value net of transaction costs and thereafter at amortised cost until extinguished on conversion or redemption. The corresponding dividends relating to the liability component are charged as interest expense in the income statement. The initial fair value of the liability component is determined using a market rate for an equivalent liability without a conversion feature.
The remainder of the proceeds on issue is allocated to the equity component and included in shareholders' equity, net of transaction costs. The carrying amount of the equity component is not re-measured in subsequent years.
Transaction costs are apportioned between the liability and equity components of the shares, based on the allocation of proceeds to the liability and equity components when the instruments are first recognised.
h. Investments
Investments are measured subsequently at fair value with changes in fair value recognised in the revaluation reserve. Gains and losses are recognised in the profit and loss when they are sold or when the investment is impaired.
40. INVESTMENTS
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$ '000 | | US$ '000 |
Fixed asset investments | | | | | |
Opening balance | | | 36,095 | | 36,095 |
China Africa Resources plc | | | 57 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Closing balance | | | 36,152 | | 36,095 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Current investments | | | | | |
Investments in Dundee Precious Metals Inc ("DPM") | | | | | |
1,767,849 ordinary shares | | | - | | 7,724 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | - | | 7,724 |
| | | | | |
As part of the sale agreement of the smelter business, it was agreed that the DPM shares would be distributed to Weatherly International plc shareholders in two equal distributions on 21 October 2010 and 23 May 2011.
For a listing of the subsidiaries, see note 19.
41. OPERATING PROFIT
Auditor's remuneration relating to the parent entity amounted to US$79,000 (2010: US$75,000).
42. DIRECTORS' REMUNERATION
| | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Emoluments | | | 429 | | 461 |
Contributions to money purchase schemes | | | 61 | | 51 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 490 | | 512 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Fees of highest paid director | | | 210 | | 229 |
During the year no directors (2010: nil) participated in defined benefit pension schemes and one director (2010: 1) participated in money purchase pension schemes.
43. DEBTORS
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
Debtors due within one year | | | US$ '000 | | US$ '000 |
| | | | | |
Trade debtors | | | 308 | | 10 |
Prepayments and other debtors | | | 129 | | 104 |
VAT | | | 57 | | 147 |
| | | | | |
Total current | | | 494 | | 261 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Debtors due after more than one year | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Amount due from subsidiary undertakings (note 52) | | | 54,233 | | 46,043 |
| | | | | |
Total non-current | | | 54,233 | | 46,043 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total debtors | | | 54,727 | | 46,304 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
44. CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR
| Note | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
| | | | | |
Trade creditors | | | 319 | | 887 |
Other creditors and accruals | | | 398 | | 163 |
Dividend | 45 | | - | | 7,723 |
Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse SA | 24 | | 3,516 | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | 4,233 | | 8,773 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
45. DIVIDENDS
A condition of the disposal of Namibian Custom Smelters Ltd was that Weatherly International plc would issue shares received in Dundee Precious Metals Inc to its shareholders. The shares were issued in two instalments of 883,924 shares each. At receipt the shares were valued at US$3.15 and at year end they were valued at US$4.37. At the time of the first distribution on 21 October 2010 the shares were valued at US$5.50 and at the time of the second distribution on 23 May 2011 they were valued at US$8.53. The dividend has been accounted for as follows:
| | | | | US$'000 |
Dividend declared on receipt | | | | | 5,570 |
Revaluation to equity reserve | | | | | 2,153 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Dividends in creditors at 30 June 2010 (note 44) | | | | | 7,723 |
Revaluation to equity reserve on initial distribution | | | 1,001 | | |
Revaluation to equity reserve on final distribution | | | 3,674 | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Increase in valuation of dividend when paid | | | | | 4,675 |
Dividend paid | | | | | (12,398) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Dividends in creditors at 30 June 2011 (note 44) | | | | | - |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
46. SUBSIDIARIES
Details of the company's subsidiaries at 30 June 2011 are as included in the consolidated group accounts under note 19a.
47. FINANCIAL ASSETS
Loans to other group entities
At the balance sheet date amounts receivable from the fellow group companies were US$54.2 million (2010: US$46.0 million). The carrying amount of these assets approximates to their fair value. These amounts owing from group companies are shown net of an impairment amount of US$10.5 million (2010: US$10.5 million). Following a review by the directors these are considered due after more than one year as there is no agreed repayment date.
Cash and cash equivalents
These comprise cash held by the company and short-term bank deposits with an original maturity of three months or less. The carrying amount of these assets approximates their fair value.
48. FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables
Trade payables principally comprise amounts outstanding for trade purchases and ongoing costs.
The carrying amount of trade payables approximates their fair value.
Borrowings
The company had no bank borrowings during the financial year. US$3.2 million was borrowed from Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse SA, see note 24.
49. MOVEMENT IN SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS
| Issued capital | Share premium | Merger reserve | Capital redemption reserve | Share-based payment reserve | Other reserve | Retained earnings | Total equity |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2009 | 3,527 | 71,729 | 18,471 | 454 | 1,413 | (469) | (22,229) | 72,896 |
| | | | | | | | |
Profit for the year | - | - | - | - | - | 469 | 17,647 | 18,116 |
Dividend | | | | | | | (7,724) | (7,724) |
Proceeds of issue of shares | 333 | 1,667 | - | - | - | - | - | 2,000 |
Revaluation of shares | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,153 | 2,153 |
Lapsed options and warrants | - | - | - | - | (1,171) | - | 1,171 | - |
Share-based payments | - | - | - | - | 314 | - | - | 314 |
Settlement of compound financial instrument | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - |
Capital reduction | - | (73,396) | | (454) | - | - | 73,850 | - |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2010 | 3,860 | - | 18,471 | - | 556 | - | 64,868 | 87,755 |
| | | | | | | | |
Profit for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | (705) | (705) |
Dividend | - | - | - | - | - | - | (4,675) | (4,675) |
Revaluation of shares | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4,675 | 4,675 |
Proceeds of issue of shares | 721 | 6,092 | - | - | - | - | - | 6,813 |
Lapsed options and warrants | - | - | - | - | (404) | - | 404 | 0 |
Share-based payments | - | - | - | - | 150 | - | - | 150 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
At 30 June 2011 | 4,581 | 6,092 | 18,471 | - | 302 | - | 64,567 | 94,013 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
50. PROFIT/(LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO MEMBERS OF THE PARENT COMPANY
The loss for the year dealt with in the accounts of the parent company, Weatherly International plc, was US$705,000 (2010: profit of US$17,947,000). As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, no separate profit or loss account is presented in respect of the parent company.
51. POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS
See note 34.
52. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following related party transactions occurred with Weatherly Mining Namibia Ltd, a non wholly owned subsidiary.
| | | 30 June 2011 | | 30 June 2010 |
| | | US$'000 | | US$'000 |
Related party balances | | | | | |
Debtors | | | 45,146 | | 37,375 |
Management fee | | | 190 | | 90 |
Interest paid | | | 881 | | 1,179 |
| | | | | |
RNS news service provided by Hemscott Group Limited.